UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.20549


D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

 (Rule

(Rule 14a-101)


INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934


Filed by the Registrantþ

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant¨

Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
Definitive Proxy Statement
Definitive Additional Materials
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

¨Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þDefinitive Proxy Statement
¨Definitive Additional Materials
¨Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

LIFEWAY FOODS, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)


(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)

No fee required.
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

þNo fee required.
¨Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
 (1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
 (2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
 (4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
 (5)Total fee paid:

¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)       Amount Previously Paid:

(2)       Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)       Filing Party:

(4)       Date Filed:

 (1)Amount Previously Paid:
(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)Filing Party:
(4)Date Filed:

LIFEWAY FOODS, INC.

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

To Be Held On June 17, 2016


14, 2018

Dear Fellow Shareholders:


We invite you to attend the 2016 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Lifeway Foods, Inc., an Illinois corporation (the "Company"(“Lifeway,” “we,” “us,” or the “Company”), which will be held on Thursday, June 17, 2016,14, 2018, at 2:00 p.m., local time (the "Annual Meeting"“Annual Meeting”), at the Holiday Inn, 5300 W. Touhy Avenue, Skokie, Illinois 60077. At the Annual Meeting, you will be asked to vote on the following proposals (as more fully described in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice):

1.
To elect eight (8)8 members of the Company'sLifeway’s Board of Directors to serve until the 20172019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (or until successors are elected or directors resign or are removed).

2.
To ratify the appointment of Mayer Hoffman McCann P. C. as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31,, 2016.
2018.

3.The vote upon a non-binding advisory resolution approving the Company's compensation for named executive officers.

4.3.To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

Only shareholders of record at the close of business on April 18, 201613, 2018 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof.


YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. WE HOPE YOU WILL ATTEND THIS ANNUAL MEETING IN PERSON. HOWEVER, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING, PLEASE PROMPTLY VOTE YOUR SHARES VIA THE INTERNET OR THE TOLL-FREE NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN THE ENCLOSED MATERIALS. IF YOU RECEIVED A PROXY CARD BY MAIL, PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN IT IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED. IF YOU RECEIVED MORE THAN ONE PROXY CARD, IT IS AN INDICATION THAT YOUR SHARES ARE REGISTERED IN MORE THAN ONE ACCOUNT. PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN AND RETURNEACH PROXY CARD YOU RECEIVE. IF YOU ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTE IN PERSON, YOUR VOTE BY PROXY WILL NOT BE USED.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS


/s/ Edward Smolyansky                                      
Edward Smolyansky
Secretary

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
/s/ Douglas A. Hass
Douglas A. Hass
General Counsel and Assistant Corporate Secretary

Chicago, Illinois

Date:April 29, 30, 20182016




























[Intentionally left blank]





LIFEWAY FOODS, INC.

6431 W. Oakton

Morton Grove, Illinois 60053

 

PROXY STATEMENT

2016

2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

June 17, 2016


GENERAL
This Proxy Statement14, 2018

General

The enclosed proxy is being furnished to the shareholders of LIFEWAY FOODS, INC. (the "Company" or "Lifeway") in connection with the solicitation of proxiessolicited by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of LIFEWAY FOODS, INC. (“Lifeway,” “we,” “us,” or the Company (the "Board"“Company”).  The proxies are for use at the 2016Lifeway’s 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held on Friday,Thursday, June 17, 2016,14, 2018, at 2:00 p.m., local time, or at any adjournment thereof (the "Annual Meeting"“Annual Meeting”). The Annual Meeting will be held at the Holiday Inn, 5300 W. Touhy Avenue, Skokie, Illinois 60077. The Company'sLifeway’s telephone number is (847) 967-1010.

The shares represented by your This Proxy Statement and accompanying proxy materials are first being mailed to shareholders on April 30, 2018.

What Am I Voting On?

You will be votedentitled to vote on the following proposals at the Annual Meeting as therein specified (if the proxy is properly executed and returned, and not revoked).

If no directions are given on the proxy, the shares represented by your proxy will be voted:
FOR the election of the director nominees named herein (Proposal One), unless you are a record holder of your shares and specifically withhold authority to vote for one or more of the director nominees.  If you hold your shares through a broker in "street name," your broker will not be allowed to vote on Proposal One unless you direct your broker as to such vote.
FOR ratifying the appointment of Mayer Hoffman McCann P. C. as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016 (Proposal Two).
FOR the approval of the non-binding advisory resolution approving the Company's compensation of our named Executive Officers (Proposal Three).
The Company knows of no other matters to be submitted to the Annual Meeting.  If any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying form of proxy to vote the shares they represent as the Board may recommend.


Meeting:

·The election of the director nominees named herein to serve on our Board for a term of office expiring at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until their successors are elected and duly qualified (Proposal One);
·The ratification of the selection of Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018 (Proposal Two).
·Any other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any continuation, postponement, or adjournment thereof.

Who Can Vote?

·The Board has set April 13, 2018 as the Record Date for the Annual Meeting. You are entitled to notice and to vote if you were a holder of record of Common Stock as of the close of business on April 13, 2018. Your shares may be voted at the Annual Meeting only if you are present in person or your shares are represented by a valid proxy.

YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. PLEASE SUBMIT YOUR PROXY EVEN IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING.

VOTING SECURITIES

Shareholders of record at the close of business on April 18, 201613, 2018 (the "Record Date"“Record Date”) are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. As ofYou can obtain directions to the Record Date, 16,158,858 shares of the Company's Common Stock, no par value ("Common Stock"), were issued and outstanding.

Annual Meeting by calling Lifeway at (847) 967-1010.

Each holder of Common Stock is entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock held as of the Record Date.

You may vote by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person or you may vote by submitting a proxy. The method of voting by proxy differs for shares held as a record holder and shares held in “street name.” If you hold your shares of Common Stock as a record holder, you may vote your shares over the Internet or by phone by following the instructions on the proxy card or by completing, dating, and signing the proxy card that you receive, and by promptly returning the proxy card via mail in the envelope provided. If you hold your shares of Common Stock in street name, which means that your shares are held of record by a broker, bank, or other nominee, you will receive instructions from your broker, bank, or other nominee that includes instructions on how to vote your shares.

1

If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote your shares as follows:

·To vote in person, come to the Annual Meeting and we will give you a ballot when you arrive.

·To vote through the Internet, go to http://www.proxyvote.com to complete an electronic proxy card. You will be asked to provide the company number and control number from the proxy card. Your Internet vote must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time on June 13, 2018 to be counted.

·To vote by phone, call (800) 690-6903 and follow the pre-recorded instructions. You will be asked to provide the company number and control number from the proxy card. Your telephone vote must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time on June 13, 2018 to be counted.

·To vote using the proxy card delivered to you, simply complete, sign, and date the proxy card and return it promptly in the envelope provided. If you return your signed proxy card to us before the Annual Meeting, we will vote your shares as you direct.

QUORUM; ABSTENTIONS; BROKER NON-VOTES

As of the Record Date, 15,877,851 shares of Lifeway’s Common Stock, no par value, were issued and outstanding. We have no other class of securities outstanding. A majority of the aggregate voting power of the outstanding shares of Common Stock as of the Record Date must be present, in person or by proxy, at the Annual Meeting in order to have the required quorum for the transaction of business. If the aggregate voting power of the shares of Common Stock present, in person and by proxy, at the Annual Meeting does not constitute the required quorum, we may adjourn the Annual Meeting may be adjourned to a subsequent date for the purpose of obtaining a quorum.

Shares of Common Stock that are voted "FOR," "AGAINST"“FOR,” “WITHHOLD,” or "ABSTAIN"“AGAINST” on a matter are treated both as being present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of establishing a quorum.  Shares that are voted "FOR," "AGAINST" or "ABSTAIN" with respect to a matter will also be treatedquorum and as shares entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting (the "Votes Cast"“Votes Cast”) with respect to such matter. Abstentions will be counted for purposes of quorum and will have the same effect as a vote "AGAINST" a proposal.

Broker non-votesNon-Votes (i.e., votes from shares of Common Stock held as of the Record Date by brokers or other custodians as to which the beneficial owners have given no voting instructions) will be counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business, but will not be counted for purposes of determining the number of Votes Cast with respect to a particular proposal on which the broker has expressly not voted. Accordingly, broker non-votesAbstentions and Broker Non-Votes, therefore, will not affecthave no effect on proposals that require a plurality or majority of Votes Cast for approval, but will have the outcomesame effect as a vote “against” proposals requiring any percentage of the outstanding voting securities for approval. Brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote on a proposal.
the election of directors.

DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS TO BE PRESENTED AT OUR NEXT ANNUAL MEETING

In order for any shareholder proposal submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"“Exchange Act”), to be included in the Company'sour Proxy Statement to be issued in connection with the 20172019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we must receive such shareholder proposal must be received by the Companyproposals no later than December 26, 2017.31, 2018. Any such shareholder proposal submitted, including any accompanying supporting statement, may not exceed 500 words, as per Rule 14a-8(d) of the Exchange Act. All shareholder proposals must be made in writing and addressed to the Company'sLifeway’s Secretary Edward Smolyansky, at 6431or Assistant Secretary, c/o Lifeway Foods, Legal Department, 6101 West Oakton, Morton Grove,Gross Point Road, Niles, Illinois 60053.60714.

2

PROXY CARD AND REVOCABILITY OF PROXY

Any

You may vote by completing and mailing the enclosed proxy given pursuantcard. As a shareholder of record, if you sign the proxy card but do not specify how you want your shares to be voted, your shares will be voted by the proxy holders named in the enclosed proxy as follows:

·FOR the election of the director nominees named herein (Proposal One), unless you are a record holder of your shares and specifically withhold authority to vote for one or more of the director nominees. If you hold your shares through a broker in “street name,” your broker will not be allowed to vote on Proposal One unless you direct your broker as to such vote.
·FOR ratifying the appointment of Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018 (Proposal Two).

In their discretion, the proxy holders named in the enclosed proxy are authorized to vote on any other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting and at any continuation, postponement or adjournment thereof. The Board knows of no other items of business as of the date of this solicitationProxy Statement that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting other than those described in this Proxy Statement. In addition, we did not receive any shareholder proposals or nominations on a timely basis, so no such matters may be revokedbrought to a vote at the Annual Meeting.

If you vote by the person giving itproxy, you may revoke that proxy or change your vote at any time before its useit is voted at the Annual Meeting. Shareholders of record may revoke a proxy or change their vote prior to the Annual Meeting by delivering to the Company'sLifeway’s Secretary Mr. Smolyansky,or Assistant Secretary, c/o Legal Department, Lifeway Foods, 6101 West Gross Point Road, Niles, Illinois 60714, a written notice of revocation, a duly executed proxy bearing a later date, or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. Attending the Annual Meeting in and of itself will not, constituteby itself, revoke a revocationproxy. If your shares are held in the name of a proxy.

DISSENTERS'bank, broker, or other nominee, you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your bank, broker, or other nominee. Please note that if your shares are held of record by a bank, broker, or other nominee, and you decide to attend and vote at the Annual Meeting, your vote in person at the Annual Meeting will not be effective unless you present a legal proxy issued in your name from the record holder (your bank, broker, or other nominee).

DISSENTERS’ RIGHT OF APPRAISAL

Under Illinois General Corporation Law and the Company'sLifeway’s Certificate of Incorporation, shareholders are not entitled to any appraisal or similar rights of dissenters with respect to any of the proposals to be acted uponon at the Annual Meeting.

2

AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS AND SOLICITATION

Proxies OF PROXIES

Lifeway will bear the entire cost of solicitation of proxies, including preparation, assembly, printing, and mailing of this Proxy Statement, the accompanying annual report and proxy card and any additional information furnished to shareholders.

We may be solicitedsupplement the original solicitation of proxies by mail by certain of the Company'sour directors, executive officers, and regular employees, without additional compensation, in person, or by telephone, e-mail, or facsimile. The cost of soliciting proxiesWe will be borne by the Company.  The Company expectsnot pay any additional compensation to directors, executive officers, or regular employees for such services. We may reimburse brokerage firms, banks, custodians, and other persons representing beneficial owners of shares of Common Stock for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in forwarding the solicitation materialmaterials to suchthose beneficial owners.

Some banks, brokers

We have adopted a procedure approved by the SEC called “householding.” Under this procedure, multiple shareholders who share the same last name and other record holders have begun the practice of "householding" notices, proxy statements and annual reports.  "Householding" is the term used to describe the practice of delivering a single set of notices, proxy statements and annual reports to any household at which two or more shareholders reside if a company reasonably believes the shareholders are membersaddress will receive only one copy of the annual proxy materials, unless they notify us that they wish to continue receiving multiple copies. We have undertaken householding to reduce our printing costs and postage fees. If you currently receive multiple copies of the proxy materials at the same family.  This procedure reduces the volumeaddress and wish to opt in to householding, or if you currently donot receive multiple copies and wish to opt out of duplicate information shareholders receive andhouseholding, you may notify us in writing or by telephone. Lifeway will also reduces a company's printing and mailing costs.  The Company will promptly deliver an additional copy of any such documentthe proxy materials to any shareholder who writes or calls the Company.  Alternatively, if you share an address with another shareholder and have received multiple copies of our notices, proxy statements and annual reports, you may contact us to request delivery of a single copy of these materials.requests one. Any such written request should be directed to theLifeway’s Secretary at 6431or Assistant Secretary, c/o Legal Department, Lifeway Foods, 6101 West Oakton, Morton Grove,Gross Point Road, Niles, Illinois 60053,60714, (847) 967-1010.

3

AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
Our proxy materials are first being mailed

Attending the Annual Meeting

Admission to shareholder on or about April 29, 2016. Allthe Annual Meeting is limited to shareholders as of the costsclose of business on the Record Date with proof of ownership of Lifeway’s Common Stock, as well as valid government-issued photo identification, such as a valid driver’s license or passport. If your shares are held in the name of a broker, bank, or other nominee and expenses in connection withyou plan to attend the solicitationAnnual Meeting, you must present proof of proxies with respectyour ownership of stock, such as a bank or brokerage account statement, to be admitted to the matters described herein will be borne by the Company.  In addition to solicitation of proxies by mail, the directors, officers and investor relations staff (who will receive no compensation in addition to their regular remuneration) of the Company named herein may solicit the return of proxies by telephone, telegram or personal interview.  As of this date, the Company has retained Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. ("Broadridge"), an outside firm, to solicit proxies solely from individual shareholders of record and to print proxy notices and other related materials.  The services provided by Broadridge to the Company are expected to cost approximately $19,000.  Action may be taken on the business to be transacted at the Meeting on the date specified in the Notice of Meeting or on any date or dates to which such Meeting may be adjourned.

Annual Meeting.

PROPOSAL ONE
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Board currently consists of eight (8) directors, all of whom have been nominated for re-election. Shareholders and their proxies cannotare being asked to vote for more thanon the eight (8) persons atnominated for the Annual Meeting.Board, as set forth below. Each nominee has consented to being named as a nominee for election as a director and has agreed to serve if elected. At the Annual Meeting, directors will be elected to serve one-year termsa term of office expiring at the next annual meeting2019 Annual Meeting of shareholdersShareholders or until their successors are elected and duly qualified, subject, however, to their prior death, disability, resignation, retirement, disqualification, or until their earlier resignation or removal.

The directors shall be elected by a plurality of the Votes Cast at the Annual Meeting.  A "plurality" means that the individuals who receive the largest number of Votes Cast are elected as directors up to the maximum number of directors to be elected at the Annual Meeting.  If any nominee is not available for election at the time of the Annual Meeting (which is not anticipated), the proxy holders named in the proxy, unless specifically instructed otherwise in the proxy, will vote for the election of such other person as the existing Board may recommend, unless the Board decides to reduce the number of directors of the Company.  removal from office.

Certain information about the nominees to the Board is set forth below.

LUDMILA SMOLYANSKY, 66,68, was appointed as a Director by the Board to fill a vacancy created by an increase of the maximum number of Directors up to seven and unanimously elected as the Chairperson of the Board in November 2002. Mrs. Smolyansky has been the operator of several independent delicatessen and gourmet food distributorship businesses, and imported food distributorships. Ms.Mrs. Smolyansky and Michael Smolyansky founded the CompanyLifeway and Ms.Mrs. Smolyansky served as the Company'sour General Manager. In 2010, Ms.Mrs. Smolyansky retired as ana Lifeway employee of the Company and has continued to serve the CompanyLifeway as its Chairperson of the Board since 2002 and as a consultant since 2011. Mrs. Smolyansky currently holds no other directorships in any other reporting company. Mrs. Smolyansky is the mother of Julie Smolyansky (the President, Chief Executive Officer, and a Director of the Company) and Edward P. Smolyansky (the Chief Operating Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Treasurer, Secretary, and Secretarya Director of the Company). Mrs. Smolyansky brings many years of food industry experience, historical perspective, and operational expertise to the Board.

3

JULIE SMOLYANSKY, 41,43, was appointed as a Director and elected President and Chief Executive Officer of the CompanyLifeway by the Board of Directors to fill the vacancies in those positions created by the death of her father, Michael Smolyansky, in June 2002. She is a graduate with a Bachelor'sbachelor’s degree from the University of Illinois at Chicago. Prior to her appointment, Ms. Smolyansky spent six years as the Company'sLifeway’s Director of Sales and Marketing. Ms. Smolyansky also served as the Company'sLifeway’s Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer from 2002 to 2004. She currently devotes as much time as necessary to the business of the Company and holds no other directorships in any other reporting company. Ms. Smolyansky is the daughter of Ludmila Smolyansky (the Chairperson of the Board), and brother of Edward Smolyansky (the Chief Operating Officer, Treasurer, Secretary, and a Director of the Company). The significant knowledge base and operational expertise she has acquired by serving the Company as a senior executive for over twenty years qualify her to continue to serve on the Board. Ms. Smolyansky’s family maintains a controlling interest in the Company, and the Board believes it is appropriate to provide for continuity of the representation of the Smolyansky family on the Board as a component of our succession planning strategy.

EDWARD SMOLYANSKY, 38, was elected as a Director in June 2017 and is Lifeway’s Chief Operating Officer, Treasurer, and Secretary. Mr. Smolyansky was appointed as Chief Financial and Accounting Officer and Treasurer of Lifeway in November 2004 and appointed as the Chief Operating Officer and Secretary in 2012. He resigned his titles as Chief Financial Officer on January 1, 2016 and as Chief Accounting Officer on August 8, 2016. He also served as Lifeway’s Controller from June 2002 until 2004. He received his bacherlor’s degree in finance from Loyola University of Chicago in December 2001. He holds no other directorships in any other reporting company. Mr. Smolyansky is the brother of President and CEO Julie Smolyansky and the son of Lifeway’s Chairperson of the Board Ludmila Smolyansky. Mr. Smolyansky’s role, and Executive Chairpersonknowledge acquired, serving the Company in a senior executive capacity since 2002 qualify him to continue to serve on the Board. Mr. Smolyansky’s family maintains a controlling interest in the Company, and the Board believes it is appropriate to provide for continuity of the Board. In 2004, Ms.representation of the Smolyansky brings historical and operational expertise and experience tofamily on the Board.

Board as a component of our succession planning strategy.

POL SIKAR, 68,70, has been a Lifeway Director ofsince the Company since itsCompany’s inception in February 1986. He isholds a graduate with a Master'smaster’s degree from the Odessa State Institute of Civil Engineering in Russia. For more than 1440 years, he has been President and a major shareholder of Montrose Glass & Mirror Co., a company providing glass and mirror products to the wholesale and retail trade in the greater Chicago area. Mr. Sikar devotes as much time as necessary to the business of the Company and currently holds no other directorships in any other reporting company. Mr. Sikar brings a historical perspective to the Board.Board along with executive and entrepreneurial experiences that provide Lifeway with insights into operational and strategic planning, and financial matters.

4

RENZO BERNARDI, 77, has been80, was elected as a Director of the Company sinceLifeway in 1994. Mr. Bernardi is the president and founder of Renzo & Sons, Inc., a dairy and food service company which has been in business since 1969 (formerly, Renzo-Milk Distribution Systems). He has over 30nearly 50 years of experience in the dairy distribution industry. Mr. Bernardi is a graduate of Instituto TeonicoTecnico E Commerciale of Macomer, Sardinia. Mr. Bernardi devotes as much time as necessary to the business of the Company and currently holds no other directorships in any other reporting company. Mr. Bernardi brings deep industry experience and a historical perspective to the Board.

PAUL LEE, 40,43, was elected as a Director of the CompanyLifeway to fill a vacancy on the Board of Directors in July 2012. Mr. Lee is currently CEO and Co-founder atof Builders VC, which he co-founded in 2015 as Roniin LLC. Previously,From 2010 to 2015, Mr. Lee was a General Partner at Lightbank LLC and was a founding member and Senior Vice President at the Peacock Equity Fund. Mr. Lee brings financial and strategic experience to the Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors. He holds a MBA degree in finance from UCLA. Mr. Lee devotes as much time as necessary to the business of the Company and currently holds no other directorships in any other reporting company.

Mr. Lee’s brings to the Board significant financial expertise developed through his experience in a range of industries.

JASON SCHER, 41,43, was elected as a Director of the CompanyLifeway to fill a vacancy on the Board of Directors in July 2012. Since 2016, he has been advising and consulting for several real estate development, hospitality, and consumer packaged goods companies in Chicago and California. From 2004 until 2016, Mr. Scher iswas the Chief Operating Officer of Vosges Haut-Chocolat, currently a leading manufacturer and seller of super premium chocolate confections in the US.U.S. Additionally, he is currently a principalManaging Member of South Shore Developers Group, a real estate development company focused on affordable housing in the Chicago Area.area. From 2000 to 2004, Mr. Scher previously served as a principal in RP3 Development, a New York based construction management and development company that performed work nationwide. Mr. Scher started his career with XandO coffee bar/COSI Sandwich Bar in their real estate and construction group. His strong leadership has been instrumental in the growth and development of the businesses that he worked in over the years. Mr. Scher devotes as much time as necessary to theLifeway’s business of the Company and currently holds no other directorships in any other reporting company. Mr. Scher brings manufacturing, financial, and strategic experience to the company'sCompany’s board of directors.

MARIANO LOZANO, 49, has beendirectors

LAURENT MARCEL, 46, was appointed as a directorDirector of Lifeway to fill a vacancy on the Board on January 1, 2018. Mr. Marcel is a French citizen. He is a Director of Harmless Harvest, Inc. and Michel et Augustin, SAS and was formerly a Director of Danone North America Public Benefit Corporation. Mr. Marcel is serving as the interim CEO of Harmless Harvest, Inc. He is also a Director and President of Danone Manifesto Ventures, Inc. From 2011 to 2015, Mr. Marcel was Managing Director of Danone Nutricia India and then Managing Director of Danone India in Mumbai, where he oversaw the integration of a leading company in the Indian baby food market as well as the reorganization of Danone’s activities in India. From 2007 to 2010, Mr. Marcel was the CFO of Danone Dairy Russia & CIS in Moscow, where he oversaw the acquisition of Unimilk, a large Russian dairy company, and from 2010 to 2011 he served as the CFO of Danone Unimilk and the head of integration. Mr. Marcel joined Danone as a finance manager in 2002 in Paris, and in 2004 he became the CFO of Danone Aqua Indonesia (Danone’s water business in Indonesia) in Jakarta. Each of the Company since March 2015. He is an Argentine citizenabove Danone entities are affiliated with Danone North America Public Benefit Corporation. Mr. Marcel graduated from HEC and was appointed PresidentParis Law School in 1994, and CEO of the Dannon Company, Inc., effective January 1, 2014. From March 2009 to December 2013, Mr. Lozano was General Manager of DANONE Brazil. Mr. Lozanohe started his career practicing law in various sales functions at Cerveceria y Malteria Quilmes, leader of the Argentinean beer market,Paris and was then appointed Sales Director of Pilsbury Argentina.New York with a focus in mergers & acquisitions and private equity. Mr. Lozano joined DANONE in March, 2000 as General Manager of Logistica La Serenisima S.A., in charge of sales and distribution for DANONE and La Serenisima products in Argentina. From 2004 to 2006 he was General Manager of DANONE Slovakia and from January 2006 to May 2009, General Manager of DANONE Clover (Pty) in South Africa. Mr. Lozano has been designated by DS Waters, LP (as the related successor to The Dannon Company, Inc.) to be its representative to the Board. Mr. Lozano holds an Industrial Engineer Diploma from the University of Buenos Aires, Argentina and brings deep industry experience. Mr. LozanoMarcel devotes as much time as necessary to the business of the Company and currently holds no other directorships in any other reporting company.

4

SUSIE HULTQUIST, 47, is co-portfolio manager of Wanger US Smaller Companies Fund.  Ms. Hultquist is also a domestic analyst covering and managing the consumer discretionary sector (including consumer internet, specialty retail, branded accessories, apparel and footwear and luxury goods) at Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC for the Acorn family of public equity mutual funds.  Ms. Hultquist joined Columbia Wanger in 2000 and has been a member of the investment community since 1990. Prior to joining Columbia Wanger, Ms. Hultquist was a vice president with Banc of America Securities LLC, Distressed Debt Fund as well as an analyst with private equity firm Continental Illinois Venture Corporation.  Ms. Hultquist earned a B.S. from the University of Illinois at Urbana and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS ATHAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE "FOR" THE ELECTION“FOR” EACH OF THE NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.

5

PROPOSAL TWO
RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The

At a meeting held on April 13, 2018, Lifeway’s Audit Committee of our Board has selectedunanimously recommended the firmreappointment ofMayer Hoffman McCann P. C. ("MHM"(“MHM”)as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016, subject to ratification by our shareholders2018. While the Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, termination, and oversight of the independent auditor, we are requesting, as a matter of good corporate governance, that at the Annual Meeting.  Meeting shareholders ratify the selection of MHM as our independent registered public accounting firm. Our Audit Committee first engaged MHM on September 12, 2015, andMHM has been our independent registered public accounting firm since that date for periods endedending after December 31, 2014. A representative of MHM is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement, if desired, and respond to appropriate questions.

More information about our independent registered public accounting firm is available under the heading "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" on page 23 below.
The approval of the ratification of the appointment of MHM as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 20162018 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the Votes Cast.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOUSHAREHOLDERS VOTE "FOR"“FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF MHM AS OUR INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2016.


PROPOSAL THREE
ADVISORY RESOLUTION APPROVING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Shareholders have an opportunity to cast an advisory vote on compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. This proposal, commonly known as "Say on Pay," gives shareholders the opportunity to approve, reject or abstain from voting on the proposed resolution regarding our fiscal year 2015 executive compensation program.
Our compensation philosophy policies are comprehensively described in the Director and Executive Officer Compensation section, and the accompanying tables (including all footnotes) and narrative, beginning on page 12 of this Proxy Statement. Our Compensation Committee designs our compensation policies for our named executive officers to create executive compensation arrangements that are linked both to the creation of long-term growth, sustained shareholder value and individual and corporate performance, and are competitive with peer companies of similar size, value and complexity and encourage stock ownership by our senior management. Based on its review of the total compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal year 2015, the Board believes that the total compensation for each of the named executive officers is reasonable and effectively achieves the designed objectives of driving superior business and financial performance, attracting, retaining and motivating our people, aligning our executives with shareholders' long-term interests, focusing on the long-term and creating balanced program elements that discourage excessive risk taking.
5

Our REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board of Directors values the opinions that our

Our shareholders express in their votes and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future executive compensation decisions as it deems appropriate. The approval of the non-binding resolution approving the compensation of our named executive officers requires that the votes cast in favor of the proposal exceed the number of votes cast in opposition to the proposal. However, neither the approval nor the disapproval of this resolution will be binding onelect the Board of Directors, or us nor construed as overruling a decision by the Board of Directors or us. Neither the approval nor the disapproval of this resolution will create or imply any changewhose primary responsibility is to foster Lifeway’s long-term health, growth, success, and financial condition, consistent with its fiduciary duty to our fiduciary duties or create or imply any additional fiduciary duties for the Board of Directors or us.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THE APPROVAL OF THE NON-BINDING ADVISORY RESOLUTION APPROVING THE COMPANY'S COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS:
"RESOLVED, that the Company's shareholders APPROVE, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Company's named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to the SEC's compensation disclosure rules, including the compensation tables and narrative discussion."
OTHER MATTERS
shareholders. The Board does not know of any otherserves as our ultimate decision-making body, except for those matters that may be brought beforereserved to or shared with the Annual Meeting.  However, if any such other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, the proxies may use their own judgment to determine how to vote your shares.
MATTERS RELATING TO OUR GOVERNANCE
Board of Directors
shareholders. The Board establishes broad corporate policies and selects and oversees the Company's risk management including understanding the risks the Company faces and what steps management is taking to manage those risks, as well as understanding what level of risk is appropriate for the Company.  The Board's role in the Company's risk oversight process includes receiving regular updates from members of senior management, on areaswho are charged by the Board with conducting Lifeway’s business.

Voting for Directors; Director Resignation Policy

Each director in an uncontested election must be elected by a majority of material riskthe Votes Cast at the Annual Meeting, or by a plurality of the Votes Cast at the Annual Meeting in a contested election. If any nominee is not available for election at the time of the Annual Meeting (which is not anticipated), the proxy holders named in the proxy, unless specifically instructed otherwise in the proxy, will vote for the election of such other person as the existing Board may recommend, unless the Board decides to reduce the number of our directors.

Consistent with our Bylaws, under our Board’s policy, any director who fails to be elected must offer to tender his or her resignation to the Company, including operational, financial, legal and regulatory, human resources, employment, and strategic risks.

Board. The Board nominates for election or re-election as director, and fills director vacancies with, only those candidates who agree to tender their irrevocable resignations upon (1) the failure to receive the required vote at the annual meeting at which they face election or re-election and (2) Board acceptance of Directorssuch resignation.

If an incumbent director fails to receive the required vote for re-election, the Board and the Nominating Committee (or Audit Committee, if the Board has not established a Nominating Committee) will act on an expedited basis to determine whether to accept the director’s resignation and will submit such recommendation for prompt consideration by the Board. The Board expects the director whose resignation is under consideration to abstain from participating in any decision regarding that resignation. The Nominating (or Audit) Committee and the Board may consider any factors they deem relevant in deciding whether to accept a director’s resignation.

Director Independence

At least annually and in connection with any individuals being nominated to serve on the Board, the Board reviews the independence of each director or nominee and affirmatively determines annuallywhether each director or nominee qualifies as independent. The Board believes that shareholder interests are best served by having a number of objective, independent representatives on the Board. A majority of the current Board, consisting of Mr. Bernardi, Mr. Lee, Mr. Marcel, Mr. Scher, and Mr. Sikar, are “independent directors” as defined in the listing standards of Nasdaq and none of them have relationships to Lifeway that are material to that director’s ability to be independent from management in connection with the duties of a board member.

6

The Audit Committee is composed solely of independent directors. In addition, the Board and the Audit Committee have complete and open access to any member of management and the authority to retain independent legal, financial, and other advisors as they deem appropriate without consulting or obtaining the approval of any member of management. The Board and Audit Committee also hold regularly scheduled executive sessions of only independent directors to promote discussion among the independent directors and assure independent oversight of management.

Board Leadership

The Board believes that shareholders are best boardserved if the Board retains flexibility to decide what leadership structure works best for the Company. The Board of Directors recognizes that different board leadership structures may be appropriate for companiesLifeway under its current facts and in different situations.its current circumstances. Since 2002, the positions of Chairperson of the Board of the Company and Chief Executive of the Companyat Lifeway have been held by different individuals. Currently, Ludmila Smolyansky serves as Chairperson of the Board of the Company and Julie Smolyansky as Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer and the Chairperson of the Company.Board have an excellent working relationship and offer Lifeway a complementary array of skills, knowledge, and abilities.

Pursuant to Board policy, the chairperson of the Audit Committee (currently Mr. Lee) also serves as the Board’s Lead Independent Director. The Lead Independent Director presides over meetings of independent directors. We believe that our leadership structure, with a separate Chief Executive Officer, and ChairmanChairperson of the Board, and Lead Independent Director, is the optimal structure for the Companyus at this time.

Board Role in Risk Oversight

The Chief Executive OfficerBoard of Directors recognizes that although management is responsible for identifying and managing day-to-day risk, the Board and each of its directors play a critical role in the oversight of risk. The Board implements its risk oversight responsibilities by having management provide periodic briefing and informational sessions on the significant risks that Lifeway faces and how we are seeking to control risk if and when appropriate. In some cases, a Board committee is responsible for oversight of specific risk topics. For example, the Audit Committee has oversight responsibility of our internal audit function and risks associated with financial accounting and audits, internal control over financial reporting, and major financial risk exposures.

The Audit Committee also has primary responsibility for overseeing risks related to data protection and cybersecurity, although the Board also exercises oversight over these risks. This oversight includes reports to the Audit Committee and/or the Board on data protection and cybersecurity matters from senior members of our information technology department, legal department, and internal audit function. The topics covered by these reports include risk management strategies, data protection, ongoing risk mitigation activities, cybersecurity strategy, and governance structure.

As discussed in detail below, the Board also has oversight responsibility of risks relating to Lifeway’s compensation policies and practices. At each regular meeting, or more frequently as needed, the Board considers reports from management and its committees that provide detail on risk management issues and management’s response. Beyond formal meetings, the Board has regular access to senior executives. Lifeway believes that its leadership structure promotes effective Board oversight of risk management because management provides the Board, directly and through the Audit Committee, the information necessary to appropriately monitor, evaluate, and assess our overall risk management.

Board Role in Compensation Oversight

Led by the Audit Committee and the ChairmanBoard’s independent directors, the Board discharges its responsibilities related to compensation of Lifeway’s executive officers and administers our incentive and equity compensation plans. The Board also evaluates non-employee director compensation. In addition, the Board is responsible for conducting a periodic risk evaluation of Lifeway’s compensation practices, policies and programs.

In 2017, the Board engaged Willis Towers Watson (“Towers Watson”) as its independent compensation consultant to advise it on executive and director compensation matters. Towers Watson reports directly to the Board, and the Board has the sole power to terminate or replace Towers Watson at any time. Towers Watson also has the opportunity to meet with the Board during its regular meetings, in executive session (where no members of management are present), and with the independent members of the Board outside of the Board’s regular meetings. As part of its engagement in 2017, the Board directed Towers Watson to work with our General Counsel, our Human Resources department, and other members of management to obtain information necessary for Towers Watson to evaluate management’s recommendations to the Board. Towers Watson evaluated our peer group composition, evaluated compensation levels at those peer group companies, and assessed management’s proposed base and incentive (cash and equity) compensation for Lifeway executives and senior management.

7

During 2017, Towers Watson did not perform any other services for Lifeway. The Board believes that there is no conflict of interest based on any prior relationship with Towers Watson. In reaching this conclusion, the Board considered the factors set forth in the SEC and Nasdaq rules regarding compensation advisor independence.

Board Role in Director Nominations

Led by the Audit Committee and the Board’s independent directors, the Board selects and evaluates qualified candidates for election or appointment to the Board, including by identifying individuals qualified to become Board members and members of Board committees; nominates director nominees for the next annual meeting of shareholders or for appointment to vacancies on the Board; and identifies individuals to serve as our executive officers.

There are no specific minimum qualifications that the Board believes that a director nominee must meet. However, the Board believes that director candidates should, among other things, possess high degrees of integrity and honesty; have an excellent working relationshipliteracy in financial and offerbusiness matters; have no material affiliations with our direct competitors, suppliers, or vendors; and preferably have experience in our business and other relevant business fields (for example, finance, accounting, law and banking). As a matter of policy, the CompanyBoard considers diversity together with other factors considered when evaluating candidates, but does not have a complementary arrayspecific diversity requirement.

The Board meets in advance of each of Lifeway’s annual meetings of shareholders to identify and evaluate the skills knowledge and abilities.

characteristics of each potential nominee for election as one of our directors. The Board reviews the candidates in accordance with the skills and qualifications set forth in its Corporate Governance Guidelines and by Nasdaq rules. The Board evaluates all director candidates in the same manner, regardless of whether a shareholder or some other source recommends them.

Board Role in Management Succession Planning

One of our Board’s principal duties is to review management succession planning. The Board reviews its management succession plans annually and plans for the development, retention, and replacement of executive officers, including the Chief Executive Officer. Additionally, the Board oversees the risks and exposures associated with management succession planning. Our Board believes that the directors and Lifeway’s executive officers should collaborate on succession planning and that the entire Board should be involved in the critical aspects of the management succession planning process, including establishing selection criteria that reflect our business strategies, identifying and developing internal candidates to ensure the continuity of our culture, and making key management succession decisions.

Management succession is discussed by the Board in regular meetings and in executive sessions of the Board as appropriate. Directors can become familiar with potential successors for key management positions through various means, including regular organization and talent reviews, presentations to the Board, and informal meetings.

Board Meetings and Attendance

The Board typically meets at least quarterly and holds special meetings when necessary. During the 2018 fiscal year, the Board intends to meethold at least quarterlysix regularly scheduled meetings and the independent directors serving on the Board intend to meet in executive session (i.e., without the presence of any non-independent directors andor management) immediately following at least two regularly scheduled Board meetings. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 20152017 (the "Last“Last Fiscal Year"Year”), the Board held eight (8)five (5) meetings. Each current memberExcept for Renzo Bernardi, who attended three of five meetings, all directors standing for re-election who served on the Board who was then serving,during the Last Fiscal Year attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and of the committees of the Board on which they served in the Last Fiscal Year, except for Renzo Bernardi and Mariano Lozano. Paul Lee, Jason Scher, Pol Sikar and Renzo Bernardi are considered "independent" underYear.

Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the rulesBoard expects attendance by Directors at Lifeway’s annual meetings. Each of the SECdirectors standing for re-election who served on the Board during the Last Fiscal Year attended the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Nasdaq.each of the nominees currently intends to attend this Annual Meeting.

8

6

The

Communication with the Board currently does not provide a formal process

Lifeway’s annual meeting of shareholders provides an opportunity each year for shareholders to send communications to the Board.  In the opinionask questions of, or otherwise communicate directly with, members of the Board it ison appropriate for the Company not to have such a process in place because the Board believes there is currently not a need for a formal policy due to, among other things, the limited number of shareholders of the Company.  While the Board will, from time to time, review the need for a formal policy, at the present time, shareholdersmatters. Shareholders who wish to contact the Board, any committee of the Board, or any individual director or group of directors may do so by submitting anysending such written communications to Lifeway’s Secretary or Assistant Secretary, c/o Legal Department, Lifeway Foods, 6101 West Gross Point Road, Niles, Illinois 60714. The Secretary or Assistant Secretary will collect and organize any copies of written communications that we receive and provide them to the Company'sBoard or the relevant director unless the Secretary Edward Smolyansky, at 6431 West Oakton, Morton Grove, Illinois 60053, (847) 967-1010, with an instructionor Assistant Secretary’s reasonably determines that they are inappropriate for submission to forwardthe intended recipient(s). Examples of shareholder communications that would be considered inappropriate for submission to the Board include, without limitation, customer complaints, solicitations, communications that do not relate directly or indirectly to Lifeway’s business, or communications that relate to improper or irrelevant topics. The Secretary or Assistant Secretary or their designees may analyze and prepare a response to the information contained in communications received and may deliver a copy of the communication to other Lifeway employees or agents who are responsible for analyzing or responding to complaints or requests. Communications concerning possible director nominees submitted by any of our shareholders will be forwarded to the independent directors of the Board.

Controlled Company Exemption

Because Ludmila Smolyansky, Julie Smolyansky, and Edward Smolyansky, acting as a particulargroup, (the “Smolyansky family”) beneficially own a majority of Lifeway’s outstanding Common Stock, we qualify as a “controlled company” pursuant to Nasdaq Listing Rule 5615. As a controlled company, we are exempt from the requirements to have separate, independent compensation and nominating committees; a majority of independent directors on our Board; or independent directors comprising a majority of the Board select nominees for director or determine the compensation of its officers. We have chosen to take advantage of the controlled company exemptions described above. However, we continue to maintain a majority of independent directors on the Board and those independent directors continue to select director nominees and determine officer compensation.

We believe that having the Smolyansky family as a whole.  Mr.significant part of a long-term-focused, committed, and engaged stockholder base provides us with an important strategic advantage, particularly in a business with a mature, well-recognized brand. We desire to remain independent and family-controlled, and we believe the Smolyansky family shares these interests. As a result of our use of the controlled company exemption, our corporate governance practices differ from those of non-controlled companies, which are subject to all of the Nasdaq corporate governance requirements. In the event we cease to be a controlled company, we will receivebe required to comply with all of the correspondencecorporate governance standards under Nasdaq’s rules, subject to applicable transition periods.

Committees of the Board

Because Lifeway avails itself of the controlled company exemption, it maintains one standing committee: the Audit Committee. All members of the Audit Committee are independent directors, as defined in the applicable rules for companies traded on Nasdaq. The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee. The Board and forward it to any individual director or directors to whom the communication is directed.

The CompanyAudit Committee most recently reviewed the charter in August 2017 and do so at least annually. Although the Board does not currently have a policy in place regarding attendance by Board members at the Company's annual meetings.  However, each of the current directors who was then serving, other than Renzo Bernardi, attended the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and each director who is standing for re-election currently intends to attend this Annual Meeting.
The Board has three standing committees, consisting of an Audit Committee,maintain a Compensation Committee or Nominating Committee, it and a Nominating Committee.
the Audit Committee
consider our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the guidelines in the former charters for those committees when discharging compensation and nominating oversight duties. Current copies of Lifeway’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, committee charters, and other key corporate governance documents are available on our website at www.lifewayfoods.com under Investor Relations.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee consisted of Messrs. Sikar, Lee, and Scher in the Last Fiscal Year. Mr. Lee iswas the ChairmanChairperson of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee held fifteen (15)six (6) meetings in the Last Fiscal Year. The Audit Committee has met with the Company's management and the Company's independent registered public accounting firm to review and help ensure the adequacy of its internal controls and to review the results and scope of the auditors' engagement and other financial reporting and control matters.  Mr. Lee is financially literate and financially sophisticated, as those terms are defined under the rules of Nasdaq.  Mr. Lee is also a financial expert, as such term is defined under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  Messrs. Sikar, Lee and Scher are considered "independent" under the rules of the SEC and Nasdaq.

The Audit Committee has adopted an amended and restated charter effective as of March 12, 2015 (the "Audit Charter"). The Audit Committee oversees the adequacy and effectiveness of the Company'sour internal controls and is required to meetmeets with the Company'sLifeway’s internal and independent auditors to review these internal controls and to discuss other financial reporting matters. The Audit Committee is also responsible for the selection, appointment, compensation, and oversight of the auditors. The Audit Committee reviews the financial reporting and accounting principles and standards and the audited financial statements to be included in the annual report. TheyIt also reviewreviews the quarterly financial results and related disclosures. Additionally, the Audit Committee is responsible for the review and oversight of all related party transactions and other potential conflict of interest situations between the Companyand among Lifeway and its officers, directors, employees, and principal shareholders. The Audit Charter is availableCommittee relies on the Company's Internet websiteexpertise and knowledge of management, our internal auditor, and our independent auditor in carrying out its oversight responsibilities.

9

The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee (1) is “independent” as defined by applicable SEC rules and the listing standards of Nasdaq, (2) has not participated in the preparation of our financial statements or those of any of our current subsidiaries at www.lifeway.net.

any time during the past three years, and (3) is able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including a balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement. In addition, the Board has determined that Mr. Lee is financially literate and financially sophisticated, as those terms are defined under the rules of Nasdaq, and is an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined by applicable SEC rules.

Committees Dissolved During the Last Fiscal Year

During the Last Fiscal Year prior to its dissolution in November 2017 when Lifeway availed itself of the “controlled company” exemption in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5615, the Board maintained a Compensation Committee

Committee. The Compensation Committee consisted of Messrs. Scher and Lee in the Last Fiscal Year.Lee. Mr. Scher iswas the ChairmanChairperson of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee held six (6) meetingsone (1) meeting during the Last Fiscal Year.  The Compensation Committee approves

Similarly, during the compensation packageLast Fiscal Year prior to its dissolution in November 2017 when Lifeway availed itself of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and, based on recommendations by“controlled company” exemption in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5615, the Company's Chief Executive Officer, approves the levels of compensation and benefits payable to the Company's other executive officers, reviews general policy matters relating to employee compensation and benefits. The Compensation CommitteeBoard also approves the compensation of the Company's directors.  The Compensation Committee has the authority to appoint and delegate tomaintained a sub-committee the authority to make grants and administer bonus and compensation plans and programs.  Messrs. Scher and Lee are considered "independent" under the rules of the SEC and the Nasdaq.

7

The Compensation Committee has adopted a revised charter effective as of April 17, 2015 (the "Compensation Charter"). The Compensation Charter sets forth the duties, authorities and responsibilities of the CompensationNominating Committee. The Compensation Charter is available on the Company's Internet website at www.lifeway.net.
Pursuant to the authority granted under its charter, our Compensation Committee hired Towers Watson Delaware, Inc. ("Towers Watson") to advise on executive compensation matters, which included: benchmarking of pay levels for select executives and non-employee directors, incentive design, certain compensation policies and practices, equity plan authorization, and other ad-hoc requests that related to compensation and governance issues. Prior to making its decisions for an executive officer other than the CEO, the Compensation Committee receives recommendations from the CEO as to the amounts and types of compensation and other awards for such executive officer.
The Compensation Committee believes that there is no conflict of interest based on any prior relationship with Towers Watson. In reaching this conclusion, our Compensation Committee considered the factors set forth in the SEC and NASDAQ rules regarding compensation advisor independence.
Nominating Committee
The Nominating Committee consisted of Messrs. Lee and Scher in the Last Fiscal Year.Scher. Mr. Scher iswas the ChairmanChairperson of the Nominating Committee. The Nominating Committee held one (1) meeting during the Last Fiscal Year.  The Nominating

Annual Board and Committee evaluatesEvaluations

Each year, as required by our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Board and approves nominations for annual electionits Committees conduct evaluations to assess their effectiveness and adherence to fill any vacancies in,the Lifeway’s Code of Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines, policies adopted by the Board, and recommendscommittee charters, and to identify opportunities to improve Board and committee performance.

��

Board evaluation – The Directors conduct an annual evaluation of the performance of the Board the directors to serve on committeesand each of the Board.  Messrs. Lee and Scherits members. The aggregate results are considered "independent" under the rules of the SEC and the Nasdaq.

The Nominating Committee has adopted a formal written charter effective as of December 19, 2014 (the "Nominating Charter"). The Nominating Charter sets forth the duties and responsibilities of the Nominating Committee and the general skills and characteristics that the Nominating Committee employs to determine the individuals to nominate for electionreported to the Board. The Nominating Charter is available onreport includes an assessment of the Company's Internet website at www.lifeway.net.
The Nominating Board’s compliance with our Code of Ethics, corporate governance guidelines, and policies adopted by the Board, and identification of areas in which the Board could improve its performance.

Committee evaluations – Each Committee conducts an annual performance evaluation and reports the results to the Board. Each committee’s report includes an assessment of the committee’s compliance with our Code of Ethics, corporate governance guidelines, policies adopted by the Board, the committee’s charter, and identification of areas in which the committee could improve its performance.

Director Nominations by Shareholders

Consistent with the Board’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board will consider any candidates recommended by shareholders.shareholders on the same basis that it considers recommendations from other sources. The recommendation must at a minimum include evidence of the shareholder’s ownership of Lifeway stock, along with the candidate’s name and qualifications for service as a Board member, and a document signed by the candidate indicating the candidate’s willingness to serve, if elected. In considering a candidate submitted by shareholders, the Nominating CommitteeBoard will take into consideration the needs of the Board and the qualifications of the candidate. Nevertheless, just as with recommendations from other sources, the Board may choose not to consider an unsolicited recommendation if no vacancy exists on the Board and/or the Board does not perceive a need to increase the sizenumber of directors on the Board. Shareholders should submit any recommendations of director candidates for the Company's 2017Lifeway’s 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to the Company's Secretary Mr. Smolyansky, at 6431or Assistant Secretary, c/o Legal Department, Lifeway Foods, 6101 West Oakton, Morton Grove,Gross Point Road, Niles, Illinois 60053,60714, (847) 967-1010 in accordance with the procedures set forth above under the heading "Deadline“Deadline for Receipt of Shareholder Proposals to be Presented at Our Next Annual Meeting."

There are no specific minimum qualifications that the Nominating Committee believes must be met by a Nominating Committee-recommended director nominee.  However, the Nominating Committee believes that director candidates should, among other things, possess high degrees of integrity and honesty; have literacy in financial and business matters; have no material affiliations with direct competitors, suppliers or vendors of the Company; and preferably have experience in the Company's business and other relevant business fields (for example, finance, accounting, law and banking).  The Nominating Committee considers diversity together with the other factors considered when evaluating candidates but does not have a specific policy in place with respect

Website Access to diversity.

Members of the Nominating Committee meet in advance of each of the Company's annual meetings of shareholders to identify and evaluate the skills and characteristics of each director candidate for nomination for election as a director of the Company.  The Nominating Committee reviews the candidates in accordance with the skills and qualifications set forth in the Nominating Charter and the rules of the Nasdaq.  There are no differences in the manner in which the Nominating Committee evaluates director nominees based on whether or not the nominee is recommended by a shareholder.
8

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Corporate Governance Documents

We have adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines and a codeCode of ethicsEthics applicable to all members of the Board, executive officers, and employees.  Such codeemployees, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer. The Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Code of ethics isEthics, and other corporate governance documents are available on our Internet website www.lifeway.net.  We intend to disclose any amendment to,at www.lifewayfoods.com. Information contained on the website is not incorporated by reference in, or waiverconsidered part of, a provision of our code of ethics by filing a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC.this Proxy Statement.

10

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions

We have determined that there were no related party transactions in excess of $120,000 for each of 2013, 2014, 2015,since January 1, 2016, or currently proposed, involving the CompanyLifeway except for the consulting arrangement with Ludmila Smolyansky, the Company's Chairperson of the Board and Executiveour Chairperson of the Board, as further discussed in footnote 1 to the Directors'Directors’ Compensation table and as set forth below.

On December 14, 2015, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement (the "Stock Purchase Agreement") with Ludmila Smolyansky, the Company's Chairman of the Board, pursuant to which Ms. Smolyansky agreed to sell to the Company 30,000 and the Company agreed to purchase such shares under its previously disclosed repurchase plan at a purchase price equal to the product of (a) 30,000 multiplied by (b) the average of the last reported closing sale price of the Common Stock on the Nasdaq Global Market for each of the five (5) Trading Days (as defined in the Stock Purchase Agreement) immediately preceding the date of the Stock Purchase Agreement.  The transaction was consummated on December 15, 2015.

On March 14, 2016, the Companywe entered into an endorsement agreement (the "Endorsement Agreement"“Endorsement Agreement”) with Ms. Smolyansky.Mrs. Smolyansky that was effective January 1, 2016. Under the terms and conditions of the Endorsement Agreement, Ms.Mrs. Smolyansky grants an unlimited, perpetual, non-exclusive, worldwide and, except as set forth therein, royalty free, right to use, reuse, publish, reproduce, perform, copy, create derivative works, exhibit, broadcast and display Ms. Smolyansky'sMrs. Smolyansky’s name, image and likeness in Marketing Materials (as defined in the Agreement). As consideration for such license, the Company agreeswe agree to pay Ms.Mrs. Smolyansky a royalty equal to $0.02 for each Company product or item sold by Lifeway during each calendar month bearing Ms. Smolyansky'sMrs. Smolyansky’s first name, last name, or other identifying personal characteristics; provided however that such royalty will not exceed $50,000 in any month and such royalty payments will cease upon the death of Ms.Mrs. Smolyansky.

On March 18, 2016, the CompanyLifeway entered into a consulting agreement (the "Consulting Agreement"“Consulting Agreement”) with Ms.  Smolyansky.Mrs. Smolyansky that was effective January 1, 2016. Under the terms and conditions of the Agreement, Ms.Mrs. Smolyansky will continue to provide consulting services with respect to our business strategy, international expansion, and product management and expansion for which the Companywe will pay Ms.Mrs. Smolyansky an aggregate of $1,000,000 annually and pro ratedprorated amounts for periods shorter than a year. The Consulting Agreement is terminable by either party on ten daysdays’ prior written notice.

Insider Trading Policy and Rule 10b5-1 Sales Plans

Consistent with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, we have an insider trading policy that prohibits our officers, directors, and certain other employees and persons from engaging in, among other things, short sales, hedging of stock ownership positions, and transactions involving derivative securities relating to Lifeway’s common stock without prior approval of Lifeway’s designated compliance officer and the Board of Directors. Our insider trading policy permits our officers, directors, and employees to enter into trading plans complying with Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act.

Executive and Director Stock Ownership and Holding Policy

In 2018, our Board adopted a stock ownership and holding policy to better align the interests of our executive officers and independent directors with the interests of stockholders and further promote our commitment to sound corporate governance.

Under the policy, our executive officers are required to own Lifeway Common Stock valued at 100% of their annual base salary. The individual minimum level for each executive officer is initially calculated using the executive officer’s base salary as of the date the person is first appointed as an executive officer. This minimum level is then recalculated each January 1st. Unless an executive officer has satisfied his or her applicable minimum ownership level, the executive officer is required to retain an amount equal to 50% of the net shares received as the result of the exercise, vesting, or payment of any equity awards granted to him or her. Thereafter, executive officers are required to (i) retain 25% of all such net shares, and (ii) continuously own sufficient numbers of shares to satisfy the minimum ownership requirement once attained, for so long as they remain executive officers.

The policy also requires each independent director to own Lifeway Common Stock valued at 100% of the annual retainer payable to such director. The policy provides that if Lifeway awards shares to independent directors, those directors must retain 50% of all net shares (post tax) that vest until the director meets the minimum share ownership requirement and 25% of all such net shares thereafter. This individual minimum level is then recalculated each year when an independent director is elected or re-elected to the Board. Our policy requires independent directors to whom we award shares to continuously own sufficient numbers of those shares to satisfy the requirements once attained for so long as they remain members of our Board.

Shares that count toward satisfaction of the stock ownership requirements for executive officers and directors include the following: (i) vested shares held outright or beneficially owned by the executive officer or director, regardless of how acquired; (ii) vested shares held by the spouse or dependent children of the executive officer or director; (iii) vested shares held in trust for the economic benefit of the executive officer or director, or the spouse or dependent children of the executive officer or director; (v) vested shares held in a 401(k), IRA, or other retirement plan. The following do not count towards satisfaction of the stock ownership guidelines: (i) unvested shares of any type; (ii) shares subject to pledge as collateral for a loan or in a margin account; (iii) unexercised stock options (whether vested or unvested); and (iv) vested incentive performance awards that are settled in cash rather than equity.

11

Ms. Smolyansky and Mr. Smolyansky have satisfied the ownership requirements, and Mr. Waldron, Ms. Reilly, and Mr. Hass are progressing toward attaining their applicable executive officer ownership requirements. Mr. Bernardi has satisfied the ownership requirements. Mr. Sikar, Mr. Lee, and Mr. Scher are progressing toward attaining their applicable independent director ownership requirements. Given Danone North America PBC’s (“Danone”) ownership of over 21% of Lifeway’s common stock and Mr. Marcel’s status as Danone’s designated director, the Board Leadership Structurehas determined that he is exempt from these requirements.

Exceptions to these share ownership and Role in Risk Oversight

The leadershipholding requirements may be made at the discretion of the Board if compliance would create severe hardship or prevent an executive officer or director from complying with a court order, such as part of a divorce settlement. The Board expects these instances will be rare. If an exception is currently structured suchgranted in whole or in part, the Board will, in consultation with the affected executive officer or director, develop an alternative stock ownership guideline for that individual that reflects both the Chairpersonintention of the policy and that individual’s particular circumstances.

The stock ownership guidelines are administered, interpreted, and construed by the Board. In administering the stock ownership and holding policy, the Board will annually review the extent to which each of Directorsour executive officers and Chief Executive Officer positions are separated. Our corporate governance guidelines do not require our Board of Directors to choose an independent chair or to separate the roles of chair and chief executive officer, but our Board believes this leadership structure is the appropriate structure for our Company at this time, and plans to keep the roles separated.

The Board oversees the Company's risk directly and through its committees. The Board is assisted by its Audit Committee in performing its risk management oversight responsibilities with respect to financial reporting, internal controls and legal and regulatory requirements. The Board is assisted by its Compensation Committee in performing its risk management oversight responsibilities with respect to risk relating to compensation programs and policies. The Board,directors has complied with the assistancestock ownership policy.

The ownership levels of its Nominating Committee, oversees risk management with respectour named executive officers and non-employee directors as of the Record Date are set forth in the table entitled “Ownership of Common Stock by Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” below. The stock ownership and holding policy described above prescribes the amount and length of time executives or directors have to Board membership, structure and organization. The Company's management is responsible for day-to-day management risk.

9

SECURITY hold their stock after exercise or vesting.

OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK BY CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

As of April 18, 2016, the Company'sRecord Date, Lifeway’s directors and named executive officers“Named Executive Officers” (“NEOs”) beneficially own, directly or indirectly, in the aggregate, approximately 49.9%50.7% of its outstanding Common Stock. These shareholders have significant influence over the Company'sour business affairs, with the ability to control matters requiring approval by the Company'sour shareholders, including the two proposals set forth in this Proxy Statement as welland other matters such as approvals of mergers or other business combinations.

The following table sets forth, as of April 18, 2016,the Record Date, certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Common Stock as tofor (i) each person known by the CompanyLifeway to beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of the Company'sour Common Stock, (ii) each of the Company'sour directors, (iii) each of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and its two other most highly compensated individuals who were serving as executive officers at the end of the Last Fiscal Year, for services rendered in all capacities during the Last Fiscal Year (the "Named Executives"),our NEOs, and (iv) all of the Company'sour directors and executive officers as a group.

COMMON STOCK 
Name and Address (a) Shares Beneficially Owned (b) 
 Number  Percent 
Ludmila Smolyansky  6,767,968 (c)  41.9% 
Julie Smolyansky  1,017,868 (d)  6.3% 
Edward Smolyansky  761,515 (e)  4.7% 
John Waldron  0   * 
Pol Sikar  3,000   * 
Renzo Bernardi  14,900   * 
Mariano Lozano
c/o of Danone Foods, Inc.
100 Hillside Avenue
White Plains, NY 10603-2861
  0   
 
*
 
Paul Lee  0   * 
Jason Scher  0   * 
Danone Foods, Inc.
100 Hillside Avenue
White Plains, NY 10603-2861
  3,454,756 (f)  21.4% 
Mario J. Gabelli
c/o Peter D. Goldstein
GAMCO Investors, Inc.
One Corporate Center
Rye, New York 10580-1435
  831,805 (f)   (g)  5.1% 
All directors and executive officers as a group
(9 persons)
  8,075,251 (h)  50.0% 

COMMON STOCK
 Shares Beneficially Owned (b) 
Name and Address (a) Number  Percent 
Ludmila Smolyansky 5,251,309(c) 33.1% 
Julie Smolyansky 1,768,864(d) 11.1% 
Edward Smolyansky 1,508,504(e) 9.5% 
John Waldron 5,208  * 
Renzo Bernardi 14,900  * 
Pol Sikar 3,000  * 
Paul Lee 0   
Jason Scher 0   
Laurent Marcel 0   
       
Danone North America PBC
100 Hillside Avenue
White Plains, NY 10603-2861
 3,454,756(f) 21.8% 
All directors and executive officers as a group
(11 persons)
 8,056,774(g) 50.7% 

____________

*Less than 1%

(a)Unless otherwise indicated, the business address of each person or entity named in the table is c/o Lifeway Foods, Inc., 6431 Oakton St., Morton Grove, IL 60053.
(b)Applicable percentage of ownership is based on 16,158,85815,877,851 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of April 18, 2016.the Record Date. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with theSEC rules of the SEC, and includes voting and investment power with respect to shares. Shares of Common Stock subject to options, warrants, or other convertible securities exercisable within 60 days after April 18, 2016the Record Date are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of the person holding such options, warrants, or other convertible securities, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person. Except as otherwise noted, the named beneficial owner has the sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of Common Stock shown.

12

10

(c)Includes (i) 6,767,9685,223,966 shares held by the Ludmila Smolyansky Trust 2/1/05, of which Ms.Mrs. Smolyansky is the trustee and (ii) 10,00027,343 shares held by The Smolyansky Family Foundation, of which LudmilaMrs. Smolyansky is the trustee. Includes an aggregate of 2,855,0001,759,000 shares of common stock subject to pledge in accordance with the terms and conditions of a brokerage firm's customary margin account requirements.full recourse loan agreement with a lender.
(d)Includes (i) 15,72022,216 shares held by Ms. Smolyansky on behalf of minor children, (ii) 2,8864,636 shares held by Ms. Smolyansky'sSmolyansky’s spouse and (iii) 500,000 shares held by the Smolyansky Family Holdings, LLC (the "Smolyansky LLC"“Smolyansky LLC”) of which Ms. Smolyansky beneficially owns 50%. Ms. Smolyansky shares the power to vote and dispose of the shares held by the Smolyansky LLC with Mr. Smolyansky. Ms. Smolyansky disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by the Smolyansky LLC except to the extent of any pecuniary interest therein.
(e)   Includes 500,000 shares held by the Smolyansky Family Holdings, LLC of which Mr. Smolyansky beneficially owns 50%. Mr. Smolyansky disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by the Smolyansky LLC except to the extent of any pecuniary interest therein. Includes an aggregate of 116,081 shares of common stock subject to pledge in accordance with the terms and conditions of a brokerage firm's customary margin account requirements.
(e)Includes 500,000 shares held by the Smolyansky LLC of which Mr. Smolyansky beneficially owns 50%. Mr. Smolyansky shares the power to vote and dispose of the shares held by the Smolyansky LLC with Ms. Smolyansky. Mr. Smolyansky disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by the Smolyansky LLC except to the extent of any pecuniary interest therein. Includes an aggregate of 116,081 shares subject to pledge in accordance with the terms and conditions of a brokerage firm’s customary margin account requirements.
(f)Based on the numbers of shares reported in the most recent Schedule 13D or Schedule 13G, as amended, if applicable, and filed by such shareholder with the SEC through April 18, 2016 and information provided by the holder or otherwise known to the Company.Lifeway.
(g)Mr. Gabelli directly or indirectly controls or acts as the chief investment officer of Gabelli Funds, LLC, GAMCO Asset Management, Inc. and Teton Advisors, Inc. The 831,805 shares of the Company's common stock that Mr. Gabelli may be deemed to beneficially own, include (i) 5,500 shares held directly by Mr. Gabelli, (ii) 326 shares held by Gabelli Funds, LLC, (iii) 286,305 shares held by GAMCO Asset Management, Inc., and (iv) 213,000 shares held by Teton Advisors, Inc.
(h)Includes (i) 6,767,9685,223,966 shares held by the Ludmila Smolyansky Trust 2/1/05, of which Ludmila Smolyansky is the trustee, (ii) 10,00027,343 shares held by The Smolyansky Family Foundation, of which Ludmila Smolyansky is the trustee, (iii) 15,72022,216 shares held by Julie Smolyansky on behalf of minor children, (iv) 2,8864,636 shares held by Julie Smolyansky'sSmolyansky’s spouse and (iii) 500,000 shares held by the Smolyansky LLC of which Julie Smolyansky and Edward Smolyansky each beneficially owns 50%.



11

EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Executive Officers

The Company's

Lifeway’s executive officers are Ludmila Smolyansky, Chairperson of the Board and Executive Chairperson of the Board,Ms. Julie Smolyansky, Chief Executive Officer, President, and a member of the Board,Director; Mr. Edward Smolyansky, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Treasurer, and Secretary, and a Director; Mr. John Waldron, Chief Financial Officer.Officer and Chief Accounting Officer; Mr. Douglas Hass, General Counsel and Assistant Corporate Secretary; and Ms. Jennifer Reilly, Senior Executive Vice President of Sales. Biographical information for Mrs.Ms. Smolyansky and Ms.Mr. Smolyansky is included above in Proposal One.

EDWARD

JOHN P. SMOLYANSKY, 35,WALDRON, 53, is the Chief Operating Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company. Mr. Smolyansky was appointed as Chief Financial and Accounting Officer and Treasurer of Lifeway in November 2004 and appointed as the Chief Operating Officer and Secretary in 2012. He resigned as Chief Financial Officer on January 1, 2016. He had served as the Controller of the Company from June 2002 until 2004.  He received his baccalaureate degree in finance from Loyola University of Chicago in December 2001. Mr. Smolyansky is the brother of Company President and Chief Executive Officer Julie Smolyansky and the son of Lifeway's Chairperson of the Board and Executive Chairperson of the Board, Ludmila Smolyansky.

JOHN P. WALDRON, 51, is the Chief Financial Officer of the Company. He joined the CompanyLifeway as Vice President of Finance in July 2015, and became Chief Financial Officer on January 1, 2016, and became Chief Accounting Officer on August 8, 2016. Prior to his employment at the Company, Mr. Waldron was a financial consultant at Tatum during 2015, counseling a large public company on effective controllership capabilities. Previously, Mr. Waldron was Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer at Campbell Soup Company from 2011 to 2013 and Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of Navistar from 2006 to 2010. Prior to 2006, Mr. Waldron held various financial leadership positions with private and public companies including RR Donnelley, the Follett Corporation, Dominick'sDominick’s Supermarkets and Terrific Promotions. Mr. Waldron began his career at Arthur Andersen and he is a graduate of Loyola University of Chicago.
Compensation Committee Interlocks

DOUGLAS A. HASS, 42, is the General Counsel and Insider Participation

The Compensation Committee currently consists of Messrs. Scher and Lee.  None of such members was, at any time during the Last Fiscal Year or at any previous time, an officer or employeeAssistant Corporate Secretary of the Company.
None He has more than twenty years of the Company's directors or executive officers serveslegal, management, and operations experience, centered on technology-intensive businesses. He joined Lifeway as Legal Counsel in March 2016 from international law firm DLA Piper LLP (US) and became General Counsel and Assistant Corporate Secretary on November 7, 2016. From 2009 through 2016, in private practice, Mr. Hass advised and represented a memberwide range of the boardfederal and state government and public and privately held clients on a variety of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has one or more of its executive officers serving as a member of the Company's board of directors. No member of the Compensation Committee had any relationship with us requiring disclosure under Item 404 of Securitieslabor and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K.
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
In the paragraphs that follow, the Compensation Committee provides an overviewemployment, corporate, and analysis of our compensation program and policies, the material compensation decisions made under those programs and policies with respect to our executive officers, and the material factors considered in making those decisions.
The Compensation Committee reviews, analyzes and approves the compensation of our executive officers, including the "Named Executive Officers" listed in the tables that follow this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.  Our Named Executive Officers for 2015 were:
Julie Smolyansky, President and Chief Executive Officer; and

Edward Smolyansky, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Treasurer and Secretary; and

John Waldron, Chief Financial Officer.


12

The Company had no other executive officers during 2015.  The tables that follow this Compensation Discussion and Analysis contain specific data about the compensation earned in 2015 to the Named Executive Officers.  The discussion below is intended to help readers understand the detailed information provided in the compensation tables and put that information into the context of our overall compensation program.
Summary
In general, we operate in a marketplace where competition for talented executives is intense and significant.  The dairy health food industry is highly competitive.  We are engaged in the manufacture of probiotic, cultured, functional dairy health food products. Our primary product is kefir, a dairy beverage similar to but distinct from yogurt, in several flavors and in several packages. In addition to kefir, Lifeway manufactures "Lifeway Farmer Cheese," a line of various farmer cheeses.
Net sales declined by 0.3% in the year ended December 31, 2015, reflecting a 5.4% increase in gross sales offset by significantly higher discounts and promotional allowances given to customers.  Gross profit as a percent of net sales increased to 26.6% during the year ended December 31, 2015 from 24.3% during the same period in 2014 reflecting lower input costs partially offset by higher labor costs and the elevated level of promotional allowances and discounts given to customers. The Board of Directors recognizes that the continued growth of the Company is a result of the efforts, skill and experience of the Company's management, specifically the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the experience, knowledge and guidance of the Chairperson of the Board, and the oversight of the Board of Directors.
Continuity of personnel across multi-disciplinary functions is critical to the success and continued growth of our business.  Furthermore, since we have relatively few employees, each must perform a broad scope of functions, and there is very little redundancy in skills. The unique production process for Kefir, which is not widely known, requires specific knowledge and skills,technology/new media issues, as well as the multiple functions that our executives performassociated corporate law and may make it difficultlitigation matters. From 1998 until 2006, Mr. Hass was Chief Operations Officer at ImageStream, a multinational telecommunications and Internet networking equipment manufacturer. Prior to attract and retain talented executives. The Company considers the specific challenges and achievements of the Company and the Company's financial performance and growth when approving Named Executive Officer compensation.  In addition, the Compensation Committee has established performance targets and a performance based bonus program and specific performance targets for 2016 for each of Julie Smolyansky, the Company's1998, Mr. Hass was Vice President and ChiefPartner at Skye/net, a major Midwest-based Internet service provider. He holds a Juris Doctor from Indiana University Maurer School of Law in Bloomington, Indiana.

JENNIFER REILLY, 44, is the Senior Executive Officer and Edward Smolyansky, the Company's Chief Operating Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Treasurer and Secretary for fiscal year 2016, as summarized below. John Waldron, the Company's Chief Financial Officer is also eligible for a performance based bonus targetVice President of 10% of his salary and is eligible for certain equity and other long-term incentive awards, in the sole discretion of the Board pursuant to his employment agreement as more fully described below.

The Compensation Committee, pursuant to the powers granted in its charter, evaluated the past compensation of our Named Executive Officers through 2015 and determined that different elements of compensation should be included in order to achieve the most effective combination in motivating and retaining our Named Executive Officers relative to our stage of development and to ensure that our compensation procedures, policies and awards are commensurate with market standards and appropriately aligned with stockholder interests.  The structure of compensation in 2016 is more fully described below.
In 2015, the Compensation Committee engaged Towers Watson to advise on executive compensation matters, which included: benchmarking of pay levels for select executives and non-employee directors, incentive design, certain compensation policies and practices, equity plan authorization, and other ad hoc request that related to compensation and governance issues, the compensation structure and awards, including whether and how to use equity as compensation, adopting a performance-based incentive plan, and to provide market data and other analysis for compensation of Named Executive Officers and members of our Board of Directors as well as to provide advice in connection with other compensation related policies and procedures.
Objectives of Our Compensation Program
The objectives of our compensation program for our Named Executive Officers and other employees are to (i) attract and retain those executives and employees critical to our overall success, (ii) ensure compensation procedures, policies and awards are commensurate with market standards and appropriately aligned with stockholder interests, (iii) align financial and operating imperatives and (iv) remain competitive within our industry and beyond with respect to design and level of pay.
13

In the past, individual performance was measured subjectively taking into account Company and individual progress toward overall corporate goals, as well as each individual's skills, experience, and responsibilities, together with corporate and individual progress in the areas of regulatory compliance, business development, employee development, and other values designed to build a culture of high performance.  In 2015, the base salary compensation of the Named executive Officers was set at the same level as 2014 while the Compensation Committee reviewed and assessed the Company's compensation procedures, policies and practices.  Going forward, beginning with 2016, the Compensation Committee will assess performance of the Named Executive Officers objectively based on specific performance targets set by the Compensation Committee.    
Role of the Compensation Committee
Our Compensation Committee assists our Board of Directors by discharging responsibilities relating to the compensation of our Named Executive Officers.  As such, the Compensation Committee has responsibility over certain matters relating to the reasonable and competitive compensation of our executives, employees and directors (only non-employee directors are compensated as directors) as well as matters relating to equity-based benefit plans, if any.  Each member of our Compensation Committee is independent in accordance with the criteria of independence set forth in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the Nasdaq Listing Rules.  We believe that their independence from management allows the members of the Compensation Committee to provide unbiased consideration of various elements that could be included in an executive compensation program and apply independent judgment about which elements best achieve our compensation objectives.
Pursuant to the charter of the Compensation Committee, the Compensation Committee is responsible for, among other things:
 ●   reviewing the Company's overall compensation philosophy and strategy;
●   evaluating and determining the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer;
●   evaluating and setting, in conjunction with the Chief Executive Officer, the compensation of other Named Executive Officers;
●   reviewing and approving the annual Compensation Discussion and Analysis;
●   evaluating and approving the components and amounts of compensation of the Company's employees;
●   evaluating, considering and approving, in its discretion, grants and awards made under the Company's equity-based compensation plans, if any, subject to any limitations prescribed by the Board and subject to any authority delegated by the Committee to any subcommittee;
●   evaluating, considering and approving, in its discretion, compensation for non-employee members of the Board of Directors; and
●   managing and controlling the operation and administration of the Company's equity incentive plans.

Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee is authorized to retain and terminate, without Board or management approval, the services of an independent compensation consultant to provide advice and assistance. The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to approve the consultant's fees and other retention terms, and reviews the independence of the consultant and any other services that the consultant or the consultant's firm may provide to the company. The chair of the Compensation Committee reviews, negotiates and executes an engagement letter with the compensation consultant. The compensation consultant directly reports to the Compensation Committee.
14

Elements of Compensation

To achieve the objectives described above, the three primary compensation elements used for Named Executive Officers have been base salary, cash bonus and payment of certain perquisites.  The Compensation Committee has restructured compensation programs for Julie Smolyansky and Edward Smolyansky for 2016 to include a base salary and performance based cash bonus and equity award opportunities under the Lifeway Food, Inc. 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the "Plan").
ElementFormDescription
Base SalaryCash (Fixed)The fixed amount of compensation for performing day-to-day responsibilities.
Named Executive Officers are generally eligible for increases annually, depending on Company and individual performance.
The fixed amount of compensation provides our Named Executive Officers with a degree of retention and stability.
Annual BonusCash (Variable)Provides annual incentive awards for achieving corporate goals and objectives.
Generally, every employee is eligible to earn an annual cash incentive award, promoting alignment and pay-for-performance at all levels of the organization.
The Company has implemented for 2016 a formalized performance based cash incentive award plan for certain of its Named Executive Officers. This new program will provide participants with an opportunity to earn a bonus for 2016 based on achievement of critical financial performance goals that were reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee. More details on the 2016 bonus program will be disclosed in the 2017 proxy statement, as required.
PerquisitesVariableProvides perquisites to facilitate the operation of the Company's business and assist the Company in recruiting and retaining key executives.
Perquisites for the Named Executive Officers have in the past included automobile allowances, 401(k) matching, and other items discussed below.
Long Term IncentivesVariable equity based and cash based compensation
The Board and stockholders have previously approved the Lifeway Foods, Inc. 2015 Omnibus Incentive Planon October 30, 2015 (the "Plan"). In 2015, no awards were granted under the Plan.

Setting Executive Compensation
Historically, we have not used quantitative methods in setting any element of executive compensation, nor have we utilized other companies for benchmarking purposes. We used discretion, guided in large part by the concept of pay-for-performance, and we consider all elements of an executive's compensation package when setting each portion of compensation.  Year-to-year changes in base salary have usually been relatively modest based on past and projected growthSales of the Company.
15

When determining compensationPrior to joining Lifeway, Ms. Reilly led the National Accounts and Sales Planning Teams for Quaker Foods, a new executive officer,division of PepsiCo that generated over $3 billion in sales annually. Prior to this position, she was the Vice President of PepsiCo Warehouse Sales’ regional grocery business in the U.S. In this role, she led the field sales and when annually reviewingretail execution teams managing Gatorade, Tropicana, Quaker, Müller, Naked and Emerging Brands across six regions within the compensation for our executive officers, factors taken into consideration include:
 ●   the individual's skills, knowledge and experience;
●   the individual's past and potential future impact on our short-term and long-term success;
●   the individual's recent compensation levels in other positions; and
●   any present and expected compensation information obtained from other prospective candidates interviewed during the recruitment process, if applicable.

U.S. In 2015, the Compensation Committee workedaddition, Ms. Reilly held several headquarters & field sales roles during her 11-year tenure with Towers WatsonPepsiCo. Prior to review the historical method of setting compensation,PepsiCo, Ms. Reilly spent nine years with Colgate-Palmolive holding key customer management roles including Target, Dollar General, Associated Wholesale Grocers and to develop some reasonable approaches to benchmark Named Executive Officer compensation to market on a going forward basis. Beginning with compensation for fiscal year 2016, the Compensation Committee has determined it will apply market data in setting elements of executive compensation.  The Committee anticipates that it will consider market data from two sources as it sets Named Executive Officer compensation opportunities:
Valu Merchandisers.

 13Published survey compensation data from similarly-sized general industry companies

Proxy compensation data from a group of similarly-sized peer group companies

Based on consultation with Towers Watson, the Committee determined it was reasonable and appropriate to define market practice from two data sources - both inside and outside Lifeway's industry – so as to have a range of credible data points that reflect Lifeway's market for senior talent and business. Published survey data are beneficial as they contain benchmarks from hundreds of companies, and the data can be adjusted to align with Lifeway's size. Also, Lifeway may not necessarily seek to fill all executive roles from the food and beverage industry, which is another reason these data are utilized. Proxy data are useful as the Compensation Committee is able to review executive specific compensation details from an industry perspective, while also controlling for size on the basis of revenue. The section below provides insights on how a peer group was developed in 2015, and who Lifeway considers to be peers from a pay benchmarking perspective. As noted earlier, not all of Lifeway's competitors are public, and the peer group is intended to be a reasonable representation of market practice.
The peer group below reflects 18 companies in the food and beverage industry with revenues that were comparable to Lifeway.  Additional consideration was given to market capitalization and assets.  Particular emphasis was given to companies that are currently in a growth stage, with similar business complexity to Lifeway.
Peer Group
·Boulder Brands, Inc.
·Bridgford Foods Corp
·Castle Brands Inc.
·Coffee Holding Company, Inc.
·Craft Brew Alliance, Inc.
·Crimson Wine Group, Ltd.
·Farmer Brothers Co.
·ForeverGreen Worldwide Corporation
·Golden Enterprises Inc.
·Inventure Foods, Inc.
·Landec Corp.
·MGP Ingredients Inc.
·Omega Protein Corporation
·Primo Water Corporation
·REEDS, Inc.
·RiceBran Technologies
·Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory Inc.
·Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.
16

We consider the growth of the Company, its financial performance, changes in stockholder value and all elements of an executive's compensation package when setting each portion of compensation.
In setting executive compensation for 2015, no specific benchmarking activities were undertaken.
The Compensation Committee will review and determine annually the compensation for our Chief Executive Officer.  Each year, recommendations for the compensation for other executive officers (other than herself) will be prepared by the Chief Executive Officer and reviewed with the Compensation Committee and modified by it where appropriate.
2015 Executive Compensation
The amount of compensation earned by each of the

Named Executive Officers during fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013 is shown in the Summary Compensation Table below.

The Compensation Committee determined to continue the 2014 levels of base salary in 2015, while the Compensation Committee completed its review of market standards and current Company practices.
Julie Smolyansky.  Ms. Smolyansky serves as our President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to an employment agreement effective December 12, 2002.  In 2015, the Compensation Committee awarded a cash bonus award of $146,244 to Ms. Smolyansky. Ms. Smolyansky's base salary in 2015 was $1,338,789.
Edward Smolyansky.  Mr. Smolyansky served as our Chief Financial and Accounting Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Treasurer and Secretary during 2015. Mr. Smolyansky resigned as Chief Financial Officer on January 1, 2016. Mr. Smolyansky does not have an employment agreement.  In 2015, the Compensation Committee awarded a cash bonus award of $144,165 to Mr. Smolyansky. Mr. Smolyansky's base salary in 2015 was $1,340,849.
John Waldron. Mr. Waldron serves as our Chief Financial Officer pursuant to an employment agreement effective as of July 20, 2015. Mr. Waldron was appointed as our Chief Financial Officer effective January 1, 2016. Prior to that Mr. Waldron served as our Vice President of Finance from July 2015 through December 31, 2015. In 2015, Mr. Waldron's annual base salary was $325,000 pro rated for the portion of the year in which Mr. Waldron was an employee of the Company. In 2015, a cash bonus of $37,000 was awarded to Mr. Waldron.  As discussed above, Mr. Waldron was paid a prorated salary in 2015 in the amount of $137,500.
Benefits Provided to Executive Officers
We provide our executive officers with certain benefits that the Compensation Committee believes are reasonable and consistent with our overall compensation program.  The Compensation Committee will periodically review the levels of benefits provided to our executive officers.
The Named Executive Officers are eligible for health insurance and 401(k) benefits to the same extent and subject to the same conditions as provided to all other employees. The amounts shown in the Summary Compensation Table under the heading "All Other Compensation"  include the value of the Company's matching contributions to the 401(k) accounts of the Named Executive Officers as well as other perquisites itemized therein.
The Company provides a Company-leased vehicle to each of Julie Smolyansky and Edward Smolyansky, as their positions require frequent offsite travel to locations. The Company vehicle may be used for personal use as well. The Company treats the costs of such vehicles as taxable compensation to the Named Executive Officer.
In exploring, planning and implementing the expansion of the Company's distribution of products and in supporting and developing the Lifeway brand, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer roles require extensive travel, on-camera and personal appearances and requires them to be in the public eye. We pay for a number of expenses to assist Ms. Smolyansky and Mr. Smolyansky in fulfilling these responsibilities. Under SEC regulations, these expenses are required to be included in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table set forth below. In order to simplify the reimbursement of certain non-delineated expenses to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company has allowed the use of the corporate credit card by each of them in lieu of individual expense reimbursement. In 2015, certain amounts charged on corporate credit cards by the Named Executive Officers were included in the non-accountable expense plan and treated as compensation to the applicable Named Executive Officer.
17

Pursuant to its discretion, the Compensation Committee, with the counsel of its outside advisors, will continue to review the Company's expense reimbursement practices and policies for the executive officers and other employees and may revise, amend, limit or add to the current practices and policies of the Company with respect to perquisites and personal benefits.
In 2015, the Company paid $61,696 and $105,846 in income taxes on additional compensation on behalf of Julie Smolyansky and Edward Smolyansky, respectively. The Company also paid $7,500 to John Waldron to reimburse Mr. Waldron for certain legal fees pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement.
All such amounts are included in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table set forth below.
Chairperson of the Board
Ludmila Smolyansky has been and continues to be an important part of the Company's success and growth through her roles as Chairperson of the Board and consultant to the Company's management. Ms. Smolyansky has been involved in the health food market for over 40 years. Her knowledge of the history of the Company and the industry is invaluable to the Company. Additionally, Ms. Smolyansky has a vast knowledge of markets outside of the Unites States and products related to the Company's current product line.
As Chairperson of the Board, Ms. Smolyansky guides the Board in the analysis of strategic development of the Company. She brings to bear her historical knowledge of the Company and industry to advise the Board on what has and can be successful strategies and what strategies have not been successful and why. Ms. Smolyansky's business acumen allows her to lead the Board in successful long term strategic planning. Ms. Smolyansky did not receive any retainer fees or other meeting attendance fees in her capacity as a director.
Ms. Smolyansky has also been a consultant to Company's management.  Ms. Smolyansky uses her experience and expertise to assist management in more detailed and specific strategic planning and management of such strategies. Specifically, in 2015, Ms. Smolyansky assisted management with recent efforts to expand production and distribution outside of the United States, including developing plans and strategies for geographic expansion in Canada, Europe, Mexico, the Caribbean, and other locations, and developing plans for increasing distribution in those locations in an efficient and productive way. Ms. Smolyansky provided advice to management about when and where to expand, the most efficient and effective methods for distribution in different geographic areas, guidance relating to negotiating with parties outside of the United States and establishing plans for future expansion in the coming years.  Ms. Smolyansky also assists in the development of recipes and new products, and new product and facility acquisition. In 2015, Ms. Smolyansky was paid $1,000,000 in cash. Ms. Smolyansky was also provided the opportunity to participate in the Company's health benefit plan and 401(k) plan which amount is included in the "all other compensation" column of the Director Compensation table.
Recapture Policy
The Company has no formal policies and/or provisions with respect to the adjustment or recovery of awards or payments if the relative performance measures upon which they are based are restated or otherwise adjusted in a manner that would have reduced the size of an award or payment.  The Company intends to recapture compensation as currently required under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and as may be required by the rules promulgated in response to Dodd-Frank. However, there have been no instances to date where it needed to recapture any compensation.
18

Employment Agreements
Julie Smolyansky and John Waldron have employment agreements which are more fully described below under "Employment agreements and change-in-control arrangements between the Company and Named Executive Officers."
There are no employment agreements with other executive officers (written or unwritten).
Accounting and Tax Considerations
The company's ability to deduct compensation paid to covered employees (as defined in the Section 162(m) of the Code ("Section 162(m)"), including certain named executive officers, for tax purposes is generally limited by Section 162(m) to $1.0 million annually. However, this limitation does not apply to "performance-based" compensation if certain conditions are satisfied as set forth in more detail in Section 162(m). We view preserving the tax deductibility of compensation, pursuant to Section 162(m), as an important objective, but not the only objective, in establishing executive compensation. For fiscal years after 2015, the Compensation Committee has designed our compensation programs with the goal of preserving the tax deductibility, pursuant to Section 162(m), of performance-based compensation granted to covered employees but may, in its discretion, award compensation that does not qualify for tax deductibility pursuant to Section 162(m). In addition, changes in tax laws (and interpretations of those laws), as well as other factors beyond our company's control, may affect the deductibility of any compensation paid to our employees.
The Compensation Committee will monitor the tax and other consequences of the Company's executive compensation program as part of its primary objective of ensuring that compensation paid to the Company's executive officers is appropriate, performance-based and consistent with the Company's goals and the goals of the Company's stockholders.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The following report does not constitute soliciting material and is not considered filed or incorporated by reference into any other filing by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis that precedes this Report as required by Item 402(b) of the SEC's Regulation S-K.  Based on its review and discussions with management, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board the inclusion of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in this Proxy Statement.
Respectfully Submitted,

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Jason Scher, Chairman
Paul Lee


THE FOREGOING COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT SHALL NOT BE "SOLICITING MATERIAL" OR BE DEEMED FILED WITH THE SEC, NOR SHALL SUCH INFORMATION BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO ANY FILING UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR THE EXCHANGE ACT, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THE COMPANY SPECIFICALLY INCORPORATES IT BY REFERENCE INTO SUCH FILING.

19

Named Executive Officers

The following table sets forth certain information concerning compensation received by the Company's Named Executive Officers,Lifeway’s NEOs, consisting of the Company'sour Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,the two other most highly paid executive officers for services rendered in all capacities during the Last Two Fiscal Year.

 Summary Compensation Table
Name and Principal Position(s)YearSalary ($)
Bonus
($)
Option Awards
($)
All Other Compensation ($)Total ($)
Julie Smolyansky2015$1,338,789$146,244--$113,967 (1)$1,599,000
Chief Executive officer and President2014$1,338,789$100,000--$186,027(2)$1,624,816
 2013$900,000$115,000--$44,500(3)$1,059,500
       
Edward Smolyansky2015$1,485,014$144,165--$158,194(4)$1,643,208
Chief Financial and Accounting Officer,2014$1,340,849$100,000--$216,889(5)$1,657,738
Chief Operating Officer, Secretary and2013$1,000,000$150,000--$38,500(6)$1,188,500
Treasurer
 
      
John Waldron2015$137,500$37,000--$11,987(8)$186,487
Vice President of Finance and Chief2014----------
Financial Officer (7)2013----------
______________

Years.

Summary Compensation Table
Name and Principal Position(s)Year Salary ($) Bonus
($)
 Stock
Awards
($)
 Option Awards
($)
 Nonequity
incentive plan
compensation ($)
 All Other
Compensation
($)
 Total ($)
Julie Smolyansky2017 1,000,000  575,000(1)  742,438(2) 49,539(3) 2,366,977
Chief Executive officer and President2016 1,000,000    860,000(4) 41,867(5) 1,901,867
                
Edward Smolyansky2017 1,000,000  575,000(6)  742,438(7) 49,504(8) 2,366,942
Chief Operating Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer2016 1,000,000    860,000(9) 43,946(10) 1,903,946
                
John Waldron2017 400,000  40,000(11)  110,000 12,933(12) 562,933
Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer (13)2016 325,000 75,000  26,340(14)  10,600(15) 436,940

 (1)
ConsistsAn award of (a) $22,301 treatedtime-based Performance Shares pursuant to the Omnibus Plan. The amounts reported in this column represent the value consistent with the estimate of aggregate compensation cost to be recognized over the service period for the stock awards granted for fiscal 2017. The maximum value of the restricted awards for fiscal 2017 assuming achievement of all of performance measures was $1,725,000. As discussed below in the section “Consent by Danone to Common Stock Issuances to Lifeway’s CEO and COO pursuant to the Omnibus Plan,” we must obtain Danone’s consent before issuing these Performance Shares when they vest (if at all).
(2)As discussed below in the section “Consent by Danone to Common Stock Issuances to Lifeway’s CEO and COO pursuant to the Omnibus Plan,” includes $287,500 of vested stock awards (Performance Shares) earned for fiscal year 2017 that were ultimately settled in cash as nonequity incentive plan compensation because Danone declined to consent to issuances of performance-based, long-term incentive stock awards to Ms. Smolyansky underSmolyansky.
(3)Includes (a) $10,800 representing Lifeway’s matching contributions to the 401(k) plan on behalf of Ms. Smolyansky; (b) a non-accountable expensecar allowance of $28,277; and (c) the reimbursement of personal legal fees and expenses associated with her employment of $9,033.
(4)As discussed below in the section “Consent by Danone to Common Stock Issuances to Lifeway’s CEO and COO pursuant to the Omnibus Plan,” includes $100,000 of vested stock awards (Performance Shares) earned for fiscal year 2016 that were ultimately settled in cash as nonequity incentive plan as further discussed above under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Benefits Providedcompensation because Danone declined to Executive Officers," (b)consent to issuances of performance-based, long-term incentive stock awards to Ms. Smolyansky.
(5)Includes (a) $10,600 representing the Company'sLifeway’s matching contributions to the 401(k) plan on behalf of Ms. Smolyansky (c) $19,370and (b) $27,466 of lease payments related to personal usage of a Company leased vehicle by Ms. Smolyansky and (d) a one-time payment of income taxes equal to $61,696 by the Company on Ms. Smolyansky's behalf.
(2)Consists of (a) $142,257 treated as compensation to Ms. Smolyansky under a non-accountable expense plan as further discussed above under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Benefits Provided to Executive Officers," (b) $17,500 representing the Company's matching contributions to the 401(k) plan on behalf of Ms. Smolyansky, (c) $11,778 of health insurance premiums and (d) $14,492 of lease payments related to personal usage of a Company leasedCompany-leased vehicle by Ms. Smolyansky.
(6)An award of time-based Performance Shares pursuant to the Omnibus Plan. The amounts reported in this column represent the value consistent with the estimate of aggregate compensation cost to be recognized over the service period for the stock awards granted for fiscal 2017. The maximum value of the restricted awards for fiscal 2017 assuming achievement of all of performance measures was $1,725,000. As discussed below in the section “Consent by Danone to Common Stock Issuances to Lifeway’s CEO and COO pursuant to the Omnibus Plan,” we must obtain Danone’s consent before issuing these Performance Shares when they vest (if at all).
(7)As discussed below in the section “Consent by Danone to Common Stock Issuances to Lifeway’s CEO and COO pursuant to the Omnibus Plan,” includes $287,500 of vested stock awards (Performance Shares) earned for fiscal year 2017 that were ultimately settled in cash as nonequity incentive plan compensation because Danone declined to consent to issuances of performance-based, long-term incentive stock awards to Mr. Smolyansky.


 (3)14Consists of (a) $17,500 representing the Company's matching contributions to the 401(k) plan on behalf of Ms. Smolyansky, (b) $12,000 of health insurance premiums and (c) $15,000 related to personal usage of a Company leased vehicle by Ms. Smolyansky, including lease payments, insurance premiums and fuel.

 (4)Consists of
(8)Includes (a) $22,378 treated as compensation to Mr. Smolyansky under a non-accountable expense plan as further discussed above under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Benefits Provided to Executive Officers," (b) $10,600$10,800 representing the Company'sLifeway’s matching contributions to the 401(k) plan on behalf of Mr. Smolyansky,Smolyansky; (b) a car allowance of $26,886; and (c) $19,370the reimbursement of lease payments related to personal usagelegal fees and expenses associated with his employment of a Company leased vehicle by Mr. Smolyansky and (d) a one-time payment of income taxes equal to $105,846 by the Company on Mr. Smolyansky's behalf.$8,116.

 (5)
(9)As discussed below in the section “Consent by Danone to Common Stock Issuances to Lifeway’s CEO and COO pursuant to the Omnibus Plan,” includes $100,000 of vested stock awards (Performance Shares) earned for fiscal year 2016 that were ultimately settled in cash as nonequity incentive plan compensation because Danone declined to consent to issuances of performance-based, long-term incentive stock awards to Mr. Smolyansky.
(10)Consists of (a) $177,138 treated as compensation to Mr. Smolyansky under a non-accountable expense plan as further discussed above under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Benefits Provided to Executive Officers," (b) $17,500$10,600 representing the Company's matching contributions to the 401(k) plan on behalf of Mr. Smolyansky, (c) $7,251 of health insurance premiums and (d) $14,492 of lease payments related to personal usage of a Company leased vehicle by Mr. Smolyansky.

20

(6)Consists of (a) $17,500 representing the Company'sLifeway’s matching contributions to the 401(k) plan on behalf of Mr. Smolyansky, (b) $6,000$26,637 of health insurance premiums and (c) $15,000payments related to personal usage of a Company leasedCompany-leased vehicle by Mr. Smolyansky including lease payments, insurance premiums and fuel.(c) $6,709 treated as compensation to Mr. Smolyansky under a non-accountable expense plan.
   
 (7)(11)An award of time-based Performance Shares pursuant to the Omnibus Plan.  The amounts reported in this column represent the value consistent with the estimate of aggregate compensation cost to be recognized over the service period for the stock awards granted for fiscal 2017. The maximum value of the restricted awards for fiscal 2017 assuming achievement of all of performance measures was $750,000.
(12)Includes (a) $10,800 representing Lifeway’s matching contributions to the 401(k) plan on behalf of Mr. Waldron and (b) an Internet/telecommunications services allowance of $1,923.
(13)Mr. Waldron served as our Vice President of Finance from July 2015 through December 2015 and was appointed as our Chief Financial Officer effective as of January 1, 2016, and as our Chief Accounting Officer effective August 8, 2016.
   
 (8)(14)
The amounts reported in this column represent the grant date fair value of the option awards granted in fiscal 2016 calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions we used in calculating these amounts are included in Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2016 Form 10-K.
(15)Consists of (a) $7,500 reimbursed to Mr. Waldron for legal fees incurred in connection with negotiating his employment agreement and (b) $ 4,487$10,600 representing the Company'sCompany’s matching contributions to the 401(k) plan on behalf of Mr. Waldron.

In 2017, the Board’s Compensation Committee approved Performance Measures for each Performance Period in 2017 tied to three payout tiers: 85% of goal (threshold), 100% of goal (target), and 111-115% of goal (excellence). Had Lifeway achieved the third payout tier (that is 111-115% of the target goals) for each of the 2017 Performance Periods, Ms. Smolyansky and Mr. Smolyansky each would have earned the maximum incentive compensation of $3,450,000 ($1,725,000 in short-term, nonequity incentive compensation and $1,725,000 in long-term, equity-based incentive compensation) and Mr. Waldron would have earned the maximum incentive compensation of $750,000 in long-term, equity-based incentive compensation. Based on our 2017 financial performance:

·Ms. Smolyansky and Mr. Smolyansky achieved the first tier of the quarterly net revenue measures in the first two quarters of 2017 and did not achieve a payout tier in the third and fourth quarters of the 2017 Performance Periods.
·Ms. Smolyansky and Mr. Smolyansky achieved the third payout tier of the first semi-annual adjusted EBITDA measure and did not achieve a payout tier for the second semi-annual adjusted EBITDA measure of the 2017 Performance Periods.
·Mr. Waldron achieved the first tier of the annual net revenue measure of the 2017 Performance Periods.
·Mr. Waldron did not achieve a payout tier for the annual adjusted EBITDA measure for the 2017 Performance Periods.

All long-term, equity-based incentive compensation is subject to the vesting and continued employment requirements described above.

Ms. Smolyansky and Mr. Smolyansky were not eligible for short-term, nonequity incentive compensation for personal performance goal achievement in 2017. The Compensation Committee approved short-term nonequity incentive compensation for personal performance goal achievement by Mr. Waldron in the 2017 Performance Periods. The goals were a mixture of subjective and qualitative measures regarding the management of his department, support of specific Company-wide objectives, and departmental milestones. If Mr. Waldron had achieved all of his personal performance goals during the 2017 Performance Periods, he would have earned the maximum short-term nonequity incentive compensation of $200,000.


15

Incentive Plan Program

Our NEOs and other key employees designated by the Board are eligible to receive nonequity awards and awards of Performance Units under Lifeway’s 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”), the latter of which will result in grants of Performance Shares with time-based vesting requirements if Lifeway exceeds specified financial performance criteria set by the Board. The amount and value of the awards depend on our performance relative to the performance goals approved by the Board at the beginning of the Performance Period. The 2017 and 2018 Performance Unit cycles have one-year Performance Periods for all plan participants except the CEO and COO. The 2016, 2017, and 2018 Performance Unit cycles for the CEO and COO have both quarterly and semi-annual Performance Periods.

Under the Performance Unit program, assuming above-minimum threshold performance, time-based Performance Shares will be granted to the eligible participants, including NEOs, pursuant to the Omnibus Plan and the terms and conditions of the applicable award agreements. For the reasons discussed below in the section “Consent by Danone to Common Stock Issuances to Lifeway’s CEO and COO pursuant to the Omnibus Plan,” no Performance Shares were awarded to executive officers in 2016.

For the 2017 and 2018 performance periods, Performance Share awards granted to eligible participants will vest, if at all, 1/3 one year after the grant is made and following the completion of the Performance Period; 1/3 in the following year, more than one full year following the completion of the Performance Period; and 1/3 in the third year, more than two full years following the completion of the Performance Period. An award (or part thereof) only vests if the eligible participant remains employed by Lifeway on the vesting date. The Board believes that the post-performance period vesting and continued employment features of Performance Share Awards provide important mechanisms that help to retain NEOs and other key employees and to align their interests with long-term shareholder value.

The following table outlines the Performance Periods and performance measures and the Board’s rationale for their selection:

Performance Periods2016 through 2018
Performance
Measures

Net revenue

Adjusted EBITDA(1)

Rationale

The Board believes these measures are key drivers of our long-term success and shareholder value, and directly affected by the decisions of management.

The Adjusted EBITDA measure helps ensure that leaders are accountable for driving profitable growth, and making appropriate tradeoffs between investments that increase operating expense and future growth in revenue.

(1)“Adjusted EBITDA” is not defined under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and is not a deemed alternative to measure performance under GAAP. EBITDA is defined as net income before income taxes, net interest expense, depreciation and amortization, impairment of long lived assets, stock-based compensation, and similar items.

The likelihood of our NEOs and other key employees receiving nonequity and equity incentive awards in 2018 is dependent on our 2018 financial results, which in turn are dependent on many other factors. As demonstrated by the incentive payouts for 2017, we seek to have target financial and personal goals that maintain a consistent level of difficulty in achieving the full target bonus from year to year. Therefore, over time we expect our NEOs and other key employees to achieve bonuses in some years and not achieve bonuses in other years.

Consent by Danone to Common Stock Issuances to Lifeway’s CEO and COO pursuant to the Omnibus Plan

Pursuant to the Stockholders’ Agreement dated October 1, 1999, as amended, among Lifeway, members of the Smolyansky family, and Danone, Danone must give its consent to, among other things, issuances of performance-based, long-term incentive stock awards to our CEO and COO pursuant to our Omnibus Plan. Lifeway achieved certain Board-approved Performance Measures under our Omnibus Plan during 2016 Performance Periods for which Ms. Smolyansky and Mr. Smolyansky earned long-term incentive stock awards, subject to vesting. Accordingly, in August 2016, we tried to obtain Danone’s consent to the issuance of 9,416 Performance Shares each to Ms. Smolyansky and Mr. Smolyansky, the number of awarded Performance Shares that had vested. However, Danone declined to give consent. Therefore, the Board’s Compensation Committee later cancelled and extinguished this Performance Share award in exchange for cash payments to Ms. Smolyansky and Mr. Smolyansky in the amount of $100,000 each, the value of the awards when they had vested. For this reason, no Performance Shares were awarded to executive officers in 2016.

16

Similarly, Lifeway achieved certain Board-approved Performance Measures under our Omnibus Plan during 2017 Performance Periods for which Ms. Smolyansky and Mr. Smolyansky earned long-term incentive stock awards, subject to vesting. Accordingly, in January 2018, we tried to obtain Danone’s consent to the issuance of 42,910 Performance Shares each to Ms. Smolyansky and Mr. Smolyansky, the number of Performance Shares that would have vested in March 2018 under our Omnibus Plan. However, Danone declined to give consent. Therefore, the Board’s Audit Committee later cancelled and extinguished this Performance Share award in exchange for cash payments to Ms. Smolyansky and Mr. Smolyansky in the amount of $287,500 each, the value of the vested portion of the Performance Share award on its vesting date. The remainder of the Performance Share awards to Ms. Smolyansky and Mr. Smolyansky for 2017 Performance Periods is subject to the vesting schedule previously approved by the Board’s Compensation Committee in January 2017. The awards will vest, if at all, in 2019 and 2020, and will require Danone’s consent prior to issuance.

Employment agreements, severance, and change-in-control arrangements between the CompanyLifeway and Named Executive Officers

NEO Compensation Arrangements

Lifeway believes the interests of the Company and its shareholders are best served by developing and maintaining compensation policies that are consistent and competitive with peer group companies. Therefore, each year, the Board, in consultation with management, analyzes market data regarding base salary, cash bonus awards, equity incentive awards, and other benefits paid to executive officers and independent directors by companies the Board considers our primary peer group. The Board relies on management and external research to identify the individual companies that make up this group. In identifying the peer group of surveyed companies, management uses the Economic Research Institute, an industry- and region-specific compensation database, to assemble market data on publicly-traded companies having similar industrial characteristics and revenues to ours. Management and the Board review the gathered data for each of the independent director, NEO, and other key employee positions and adjust for the scope of employee’s responsibilities at Lifeway as compared to equivalent responsibilities of positions within companies included in the survey data.

NEO Employment Agreements

Julie Smolyansky hasserves Lifeway pursuant to an employment agreement (the "Employment Agreement") with the Company pursuant to which she servesdated as Chief Executive Officer.of September 12, 2002. Pursuant to the Employment Agreement,agreement, Ms. Smolyansky is entitled to an annual base salary and an annual bonus subject to such incentive bonus targets and plans which the Companythat Lifeway may adopt from time to time. The Company historicallyIn each of 2016, 2017, and 2018, Ms. Smolyansky was entitled to receive an annual base salary of $1,000,000, an amount that the Board reviews annually. She is also eligible for certain cash, equity, and other incentive awards based on the satisfaction of the Board’s pre-established performance goals. In 2017 and 2018, the Board has not set any suchbonus targets in advance or adopted any such plans.  In lieu thereof,compliance with its Omnibus Plan and applicable IRS regulations governing performance-based compensation for which Ms. Smolyansky's salary and discretionary bonus are determined on an annual basis concurrently with determining amounts for other executive officers. However, the Company has implemented for 2016 a formalized performance based incentive award plan for Ms. Smolyansky.Smolyansky is eligible. In the event that (a) Ms. Smolyansky is terminated other than for Cause (as defined therein) or (b) Ms. Smolyansky terminates her employment for Good Reason (as defined therein)in the agreement) or due to her death, then Ms. Smolyansky is entitled to a lump sum payment consisting of (y) twice her then-current base salary and (z) the aggregate of the annual bonus for which she is then eligible under the Employment Agreementagreement and any plans.

Edward Smolyansky serves as Lifeway’s Chief Operating Officer and is not subject to an employment agreement. Pursuant to the terms of his employment set by the Board, Mr. Smolyansky is entitled to an annual base salary and is also eligible for certain cash, equity, and other incentive awards based on the satisfaction of the Board’s pre-established performance goals. In each of 2016, 2017, and 2018, Mr. Smolyansky was entitled to receive an annual base salary of $1,000,000, an amount that the Board reviews annually. In 2017 and 2018, the Board has set bonus targets in compliance with its Omnibus Plan and applicable IRS regulations governing performance-based compensation. Mr. Smolyansky is not subject to any severance or change-in-control arrangements.

John Waldron serves the CompanyLifeway pursuant to an employment agreement dated as of July 20, 2015.April 21, 2017. The agreement renews automatically for successive terms of one year on January 1, unless pursuant to the agreement it is terminated earlier or the Board gives timely notice of non-renewal. Mr. Waldron'sWaldron’s base salary iswas $325,000 in 2016, $400,000 in 2017, and $410,800 in 2018. His base salary is subject to annual review by the Board. Mr. Waldron is also eligible for an annual target bonus opportunity of ten percent (10%) of his base salary based onPursuant to the satisfaction of certain pre-established performance goals established by the Board.agreement, Mr. Waldron is also eligible for certain cash, equity, and other long-term incentive awards inbased on the sole discretionsatisfaction of the Board. The CompanyBoard’s pre-established performance goals. In 2017 and 2018, the Board has set bonus targets in compliance with its Omnibus Plan and applicable IRS regulations governing performance-based compensation. Lifeway may terminate Mr. Waldron'sWaldron’s employment byfor any lawful reason, of death or disability and forwith or without Cause, and Mr. Waldron may resign for or without Good Reason (each as defined in the employment agreement).

Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Waldron, is entitled to the following payments upon Non-Renewal, termination ofwithout Cause, or by his employment:

(1)in the event of Mr. Waldron's death or Disability (asresignation with Good Reason (each as defined in the employment agreement), Mr. Waldron or his estate, as the case maywill be is entitled to (i) any earnedcertain payments and unpaid Base Salary (as definedbenefits shown in the tables below. Receipt of any severance amounts under Mr. Waldron’s employment agreement)agreement is conditioned on execution of an enforceable general release of claims in a form satisfactory to Lifeway.

17

John Waldron: Summary of payments and benefits due after termination of employment

Non-RenewalTermination without Cause or for Good ReasonTermination for Cause or Without Good Reason
Base Salary3 months after termination dateThe remainder of the term or 6 months, whichever is greaterThrough termination date
Bonus PaymentsGreater of (i) bonus for fiscal year of termination date (ii) bonus paid for fiscal year prior to termination dateGreater of (i) bonus for fiscal year of termination date (ii) bonus paid for fiscal year prior to termination dateNone
Outstanding Equity AwardsVested but unsettled outstanding equity awardsAccelerated vesting of all outstanding equity awardsVested but unsettled outstanding equity awards
Health InsuranceNoneCompany-paid COBRA premiums through the earliest of (i) six calendar months after termination date, (ii) the date executive becomes eligible for group health insurance through another employer, or (iii) the date executive ceases to be eligible for COBRA coverageNone
Financial Services or Transition-RelatedNone$10,000None

Omnibus Plan Change of Control Provisions

Pursuant to Articles 16.1 and 16.2 of the Omnibus Plan, if, prior to the vesting date of an Award under the Omnibus Plan, a Change of Control occurs and the NEO receives neither (i) a Replacement Award nor (ii) payment for the cancellation and termination of the Award, then all then-outstanding and unvested Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, and Awards whose vesting depends merely on the satisfaction of a service obligation by the NEO shall vest in full and be free of vesting restrictions.

Pursuant to Article 16.3 of the Omnibus Plan, upon an NEO’s termination of employment other than for Cause in connection with or within two years after a Change of Control, then (i) all Replacement Awards shall become fully vested and (if applicable) exercisable and free of restrictions, and (ii) all Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights held by the NEO on the date of termination (ii) any Annual Bonus (as defined in the employment agreement) earned but unpaid with respect to the fiscal year ending on or preceding the date of termination, (iii) reimbursement for any unreimbursed business expenses incurred through the date of termination in accordance with terms of the employment agreement, (iv) any accrued but unused vacation time in accordance with Company policy, and (v) all other accrued and vested payments and benefits to which Executive shall be entitled under the terms of any applicable compensation arrangement or benefit program, in each case, in accordance with their terms (collectively, the "Accrued Benefits").

21

(2)if Mr. Waldron (a) is terminated other than for Cause or (b) resigns for Good Reason, Mr. Waldron will be entitled to the Accrued Benefits and, subject to meeting certain conditions, an aggregate amount equal to one half (1/2) of Mr. Waldron's annual Base Salary in effectthat were held on the date of termination.
(3)if Mr. Waldron (a) is terminatedthe Change of Control shall remain exercisable for Causethe term of the Stock Option or (b) resigns without Good Reason, Mr. Waldron will be entitledStock Appreciation Right.

Capitalized terms used in this section but not defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Accrued Benefits other than the Annual Bonus earned but unpaid with respect to the fiscal year ending on or preceding the date of termination.

There are no employment agreements with other executive officers.
Omnibus Plan.

There are no other agreements with the Named Executive OfficersNEOs that provide for payments in connection with resignation, retirement, termination of employment, or change in control other than the Employment Agreementsemployment agreements described above.

Equity Compensation Plans

The following table sets forth certain information, as of December 31, 2015,2017, regarding the shares of Lifeway'sLifeway’s Common Stock authorized for issuance under the Plan.

Plan category 

(a)

Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights

 

(b)

Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights

 

(c)

Number of securities remaining available for

future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 47,000 $10.45 3,485,038
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders 0 $0 
Total 47,000 $10.45 3,485,038

18

 Plan category
(a)
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(b)
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(c)
Number of securities remaining available for
future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders0N/A3,500,000
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holdersN/AN/AN/A
Total0N/A3,500,000

On March 29, 2016, the CompanyLifeway filed a registration statement on Form S-8 with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the Plan covering 3,500,000 as adjusted, shares of its Common Stock.Stock, as adjusted. The Plan was adopted by the Company on December 14, 2015. Pursuant to such Plan, the Companywe may issue common stock, options to purchase common stock, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance units, performance shares, cash based awards and other stock based awards to employees of the Company.our employees. There were a total of 3,500,0003,483,038 shares eligible for issuance under the Plan at December 31, 2015.2017. The option price, number of shares, grant date, and vesting terms of awards granted under the Plan are determined at the discretion of the Company's Compensation Committee.

Board.

Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2015

As of2017

The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers at December 31, 2015, there were no stock options outstanding or exercisable and no unvested stock awards.

22

Director Compensation
Name  Cash   
Other
Compensation
   Total 
Ludmila Smolyansky $1,000,000 (1) $9,738 (2) $1,009,738 
Pol Sikar $47,000  $--  $47,000 
Renzo Bernardi $21,500  $--  $21,500 
Mariano Lozano $--  $--  $-- 
Paul Lee $186,000  $--  $186,000 
Jason Scher $147,000  $--  $147,000 
2017.

Option Awards
Name Number of
Securities

Underlying Unexercised
Options Exercisable(1)
 Number of
Securities

Underlying Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable(1)
 Option
Exercise
Price
 Option
Expiration
Date
John Waldron 2,000(2) 4,000 $11.10 01/01/2026

(1)Options to Purchase Shares of Common Stock
(2)Of this grant, 2,000 shares vested on January 1, 2017, 1,000 vested on January 1, 2018, and 1,000 vest on January 1 of each of 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021.

Clawback Policy

The Board has adopted a specific clawback policy that provides that it may claw back incentive-based compensation awards. Persons receiving incentive-based compensation awards are notified that, at the direction of the Board or its Compensation Committee after it has considered the methods, costs, and benefits of doing so, Lifeway will seek to recover incentive-based compensation awarded or paid for a fiscal period if the result of a performance measure upon which the award was based or paid is subsequently restated or otherwise adjusted in a manner that would reduce the size of the award or payment.

Director Compensation for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2017

Name Cash  Other
Compensation
  Total 
Ludmila Smolyansky $1,600,000(1) $  $1,600,000 
Renzo Bernardi $27,500  $  $27,500 
Pol Sikar $57,500  $  $57,500 
Mariano Lozano(2) $  $  $ 
Paul Lee $113,000  $  $113,000 
Jason Scher $103,500  $  $103,500 
Laurent Marcel(3) $  $  $ 

(1)Of the Fees Paid in Cash, (a) $1,000,000 represents the annual fees paid to Ms.Mrs. Smolyansky for her services as a consultant to the CompanyLifeway on strategic matters including, without limitation, plans and strategies for geographic expansion, and development of recipes and new products, and new product and facility acquisition. Ms.acquisition; and (b) $600,000 represents royalty payments as discussed further in “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.” Mrs. Smolyansky did not receive any additional retainer fees or other meeting attendance fees in her capacity as a director.
(2)On November 1, 2017, Mr. Lozano resigned as director effective December 31, 2017.
(3)On November 1, 2017, the Board appointed Mr. Marcel as director effective January 1, 2018.

(2) Represents the Company's portion of the matching contributions to the Company's 401(k) plan on behalf of Ludmila Smolyansky.19

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company'sour directors, executive officers, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of its Common Stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the CommissionSEC and to furnish the Companyus with copies of all such reports they file. Based on the Company'sour review of the copies of such forms that we received, by it, or written representations from certain reporting persons, the Company believeswe believe that none of itsour directors, executive officers, or persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the Company'sLifeway’s Common Stock failed to comply with Section 16(a) reporting requirements in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 except2017, with the exception of a late Form 4 report for Mr. Mariano Lozano who failedLudmila Smolyansky. Mrs. Smolyansky filed a Form 4 on December 26, 2017 to timely file one Form 3.

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
On September 12, 2015,report, among other transactions, the sale of 856 shares of our Common Stock on December 18, 2017 and 109 shares of our Common Stock on December 20, 2017.

AUDIT MATTERS

Audit Committee Report

The Board of Directors has the ultimate authority for effective corporate governance, including oversight of Lifeway’s management. The Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities by overseeing, among other things, Lifeway’s accounting and financial reporting processes (including the internal audit function), the audits of Lifeway’s consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, the qualifications and performance of the independent registered public accounting firm engaged as Lifeway’s independent auditor, and the performance and continued retention of Lifeway’s internal auditor.

The Audit Committee relies on the expertise and knowledge of management, the internal auditor, and the independent auditor in carrying out its oversight responsibilities. Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation, and integrity of Lifeway’s consolidated financial statements, accounting and financial reporting principles, internal control over financial reporting, and disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure compliance with accounting standards, applicable laws, and regulations. Together with Lifeway’s internal auditor, management is also responsible for objectively reviewing and evaluating the adequacy, effectiveness, and quality of Lifeway’s system of internal control. Lifeway’s independent auditor, Mayer Hoffman McCann (MHM), is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion on the conformity of those financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. MHM is also responsible for expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of Lifeway’s internal control over financial reporting.

During fiscal year 2017, the Audit Committee fulfilled its responsibilities as set forth in its charter and further described above in “Committees of the Board – Audit Committee.” The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management, and the independent auditor, Lifeway’s audited consolidated financial statements and related footnotes for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, and the independent auditor’s report on those financial statements. Management represented to the Audit Committee that Lifeway’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. MHM presented the matters required to be discussed with the Audit Committee by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board standards and Rule 2-07 of SEC Regulation S-X. This review included a discussion with management, the internal auditor, and the independent auditor of the quality (not merely the acceptability) of Lifeway’s accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant estimates and judgments, and the disclosures in Lifeway’s consolidated financial statements, including the disclosures relating to critical accounting policies.

Based on the reviews and discussions described above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in Lifeway’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 for filing with the SEC.

The Audit Committee also recognizes the importance of maintaining the independence of Lifeway’s independent auditor, both in fact and appearance, and takes a number of measures to ensure independence. With input from management and MHM, the Audit Committee also assesses MHM’s performance and leads the selection of MHM’s audit engagement partner. As part of its auditor engagement process, the Audit Committee consults with management and considers whether to rotate the independent audit firm. MHM has served as Lifeway’s independent auditor since 2015. In addition, MHM has provided the Audit Committee with the written disclosures and letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company engaged Mayer Hoffman McCann P. C. ("MHM")Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence. The Audit Committee has reviewed these materials and discussed MHM’s independence with the firm.

As a result of the review and discussions described above, the Audit Committee concluded that the selection of MHM as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending2018 is in the best interest of Lifeway and its shareholders. The Committee therefore recommended to the Board that it have shareholders ratify this selection at the Annual Meeting.

Respectfully Submitted,

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Paul Lee, Chairperson

Jason Scher

Pol Sikar

20

THE FOREGOING AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT SHALL NOT BE “SOLICITING MATERIAL” OR BE DEEMED FILED WITH THE SEC, NOR SHALL SUCH INFORMATION BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO ANY FILING UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR THE EXCHANGE ACT, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT WE SPECIFICALLY INCORPORATE IT BY REFERENCE INTO SUCH FILING.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms and Fees

The following table sets forth the fees for professional audit services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm Mayer Hoffman McCann (MHM) in connection with fiscal years ended December 31, 2015. During2017 and 2016 and fees billed for other services rendered by MHM during those periods:

Type of Fees

 2017  2016 
(1) Audit Fees $557,564  $684,278 
(2) Audit-Related Fees      
(3) Tax Fees      
(4) All Other Fees      
  $557,564  $684,278 

In the above table, in accordance with the SEC’s definitions and rules, “audit fees” are fees Lifeway paid to its independent registered public accountant for professional services in connection with the audit of our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013 through September 12, 2015 neither the Company nor anyone acting on the Company's behalf consulted with MHM2016 included in any capacity, nor consulted with any member of that firm, as to the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered as to the financial statements, nor was a written report or oral advice rendered that was an important factor considered by the Company or any of its employees in reaching a decision as to an accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue, or any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement, as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions thereto, or a reportable event within the meaning set forth in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

On August 20, 2015, the Company was notified by its independent registered public accounting firm, Crowe Horwath LLP ("Crowe") that it would not stand for reappointment as its independent registered public accounting firm for 2015. The Company had engaged Crowe as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2014.
As disclosed in Item 9A of the Company's annual report on Form 10-K, for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (the "Form 10-K"), the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's internal controls over financial reporting were not effectiveaudit of because material weaknesses identified by the Company.
23

The audit reports of MHM on the Company's consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and it was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.
The audit report of MHM on the effectiveness of the Company'sour internal control over financial reporting, as for the review of the unaudited financial statements included in Form 10-Qs within those fiscal years, and for services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements; “audit-related fees” are fees for work performed during those fiscal years for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements; “tax fees” are fees for work performed during those fiscal years for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning; and “all other fees” are fees for work performed during those fiscal years for any services not included in the first three categories. All of the services set forth in sections (1) through (4) above were approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with its charter.

For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 contained an adverse opinion, but did not contain a disclaimer2017 and 2016, we retained certain firms other than MHM for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

Pre-Approval of opinion nor was it modified or qualified as to the uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles. The adverse opinion as of December 31, 2015 was due to the effect of the material weaknesses.

The Company'sAudit and Non-Audit Services

Lifeway’s Audit Committee has adopted policies and procedures for pre-approving all non-audit work performed by its auditors. There was not any non-audit workThe policy sets forth the procedures and conditions for both pre-approval of audit-related services to be performed by MHMits auditors (assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the auditors’ review of the financial statements or that are traditionally performed by the independent auditor) and specific pre-approval for all other services for the current fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 or by Croweconsistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence. The Audit Committee is asked to pre-approve the engagement of the independent auditor and the projected fees for audit services for the current fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.during the first quarter of each year.

Unless a type of service has received general pre-approval, it will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee if it is to be provided by the auditors. Any proposed services exceeding pre-approved cost levels or budgeted amounts will also require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. In determining whether to approve a particular audit or permitted non-audit service, the Audit Committee will consider, among other things, whether the service is consistent with maintaining the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee will also consider whether the independent registered public accounting firm is best positioned to provide the most effective and efficient service to our Companyus and whether the service might be expected to enhance our ability to manage or control risk or improve audit quality. Specifically, the Audit Committee has not pre-approved the use of MHM for non-audit services.

The aggregate fees billed for professional services There was no non-audit work performed by MHM Crowe Horwath LLP and Plante Moran, PLLC for these various services were:
  
For the fiscal years ended
December 31,
 
 
Type of Fees
 2015 2014 
  
Mayer Hoffman
McCann P.C.
 
Crowe
Horwath LLP
 
Plante Moran,
PLLC
 
(1) Audit Fees $533,499  $897,590  $24,470 
(2) Audit-Related Fees         
(3) Tax Fees         
(4) All Other Fees         
  $533,499  $897,590  $24,470 

In the above table, in accordance with the SEC's definitions and rules, "audit fees" are fees the Company paid to its independent registered public accountant for professional services for the audit of the Company's consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20152017 or December 31, 2016.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
/s/ Douglas A. Hass
Douglas A. Hass
General Counsel and Assistant Corporate Secretary

Chicago, Illinois

Date:April 30, 2018

21

LIFEWAY FOODS, INC.

ATTN: LEGAL DEPARTMENT

6101 WEST GROSS POINT RD.

NILES, IL 60714

VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:The Annual Report and 2014 included in Form 10-K and included in Form 10-Qs within those fiscal years and for services thatProxy Statement are normally providedavailable atwww.proxyvote.com

LIFEWAY FOODS, INC.
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
June 14, 2018 2:00 PM
This proxy is solicited by the accountantBoard of Directors

The undersigned, revoking all prior proxies, hereby constitutes and appoints Julie Smolyansky or Edward Smolyansky, true and lawful agents and proxies with full power of substitution in connection with statutoryeach, to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Lifeway Foods, Inc. to be held at the Holiday Inn, 5300 W. Touhy Avenue, Skokie, Illinois at 2:00 p.m. local time, on June 14, 2018, and regulatory filingsat any adjournments or engagements; "audit-related fees" are fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably relatedpostponements thereof, to the performancecast on behalf of the audit or review ofundersigned all votes that the Company's consolidated financial statements; "tax fees" are fees for tax compliance, tax adviceundersigned is entitled to cast at such meeting, and tax planning; and "all other fees" are fees for any services not included inotherwise represent the first three categories.  All ofundersigned at the services set forth in sections (1) through (4) above were approvedmeeting with all powers possessed by the Audit Committee in accordance withundersigned if personally present at the Audit Committee Charter.

For the fiscal years ended meeting. 

THE VOTES ENTITLED TO BE CAST BY THE UNDERSIGNED WILL BE CAST AS INSTRUCTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE HEREOF. IF THIS PROXY IS EXECUTED BUT NO INSTRUCTION IS GIVEN, THE VOTES ENTITLED TO BE CAST BY THE UNDERSIGNED WILL BE CAST "FOR" PROPOSAL 2. THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXY HOLDER ON ANY OTHER MATTER THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENTS OR POSTPONEMENTS THEREOF.

December 31, 2015Continued and 2014to be signed on reverse side, the Company retained a firm other than MHM, Crowe and Plante Moran, PLLC for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

24

























[Intentionally left blank]
25

























[Intentionally left blank]
26



27


28